UC Davis

Background and hypothesis

The neuronal mechanisms that underlie deficits in effort cost computation in schizophrenia (SZ) are poorly understood. Given the role of frontostriatal circuits in valence-oriented motivation, we hypothesized that these circuits are either dysfunctional in SZ or do not appropriately predict behavior in SZ when task conditions are difficult and good performance is rewarded.

Study design

A total of 52 people with recent onset SZ-spectrum disorders and 48 healthy controls (HCs) performed a 3T fMRI task with 2 valence conditions (rewarded vs neutral) and 2 difficulty conditions. Frontostriatal connectivity was extracted during the cue (anticipatory) phase. Individual behavior was fit using a drift-diffusion model, allowing the performance parameter, drift rate (DR), to vary between task conditions. Three models were examined: A group × condition model of DR, a group × condition model of connectivity, and a regression model of connectivity predicting DR depending on group and condition.

Study results

DRs showed the expected positive correlation with accuracy and a negative association with reaction time. The SZ group showed a deficit in DR but did not differ in overall connectivity or show a valence-specific deficit in connectivity. Significant group × valence × difficulty interactions, however, were observed on the relationship between right dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC)-striatal connectivity and DR (DLPFC-Caudate: F = 10.92, PFDR = .004; DLPFC-Putamen: F = 5.14, PFDR = .048) driven by more positive relationships between DR and connectivity during cues for the difficult-rewarded condition in HCs compared to SZ.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that frontostriatal connectivity is less predictive of performance in SZ when task difficulty is increased and a reward incentive is applied.