Self vs. Other-Generated Hypotheses in Scientific Discovery
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Self vs. Other-Generated Hypotheses in Scientific Discovery

Abstract

Other-generated hypotheses are often considered easier to test than self-generated hyptitheses. T o determine the precise effects of other-generated hypotheses, w e propose three kinds of effects and describe a study designed to test for these effects of hypothesis source. T h e three kinds of effects considered are: (i) hypothesis plausibility changes, (ii) skepticism changes, and (iii) process changes. Forty-two undergraduate subjects were given a microworld discovery task called Milktruck. Subjects either had to generate their o w n initial hypothesis or were given the most frequently generated hypothesis. It w a s found that the other- generated hypothesis lead to m o r e thorough investigation of hypotheses resulting in a decrease in false terminations with incorrect solutions. T h e results suggested these effects were caused by an increjise in skepticism rather than changes in hypothesis plausibility or process changes.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View