Skip to main content
Open Access Publications from the University of California
Notice: eScholarship will undergo scheduled maintenance from Tuesday, January 21 to Wednesday, January 22. Some functionality may not be available during this time. Learn more at eScholarship Support.
Download PDF
- Main
Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) Into Clinical Practice
- Ruggero, Camilo J;
- Kotov, Roman;
- Hopwood, Christopher J;
- First, Michael;
- Clark, Lee Anna;
- Skodol, Andrew E;
- Mullins-Sweatt, Stephanie N;
- Patrick, Christopher J;
- Bach, Bo;
- Cicero, David C;
- Docherty, Anna;
- Simms, Leonard J;
- Bagby, R Michael;
- Krueger, Robert F;
- Callahan, Jennifer L;
- Chmielewski, Michael;
- Conway, Christopher C;
- De Clercq, Barbara;
- Dornbach-Bender, Allison;
- Eaton, Nicholas R;
- Forbes, Miriam K;
- Forbush, Kelsie T;
- Haltigan, John D;
- Miller, Joshua D;
- Morey, Leslie C;
- Patalay, Praveetha;
- Regier, Darrel A;
- Reininghaus, Ulrich;
- Shackman, Alexander J;
- Waszczuk, Monika A;
- Watson, David;
- Wright, Aidan GC;
- Zimmermann, Johannes
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000452Abstract
Objective
Diagnosis is a cornerstone of clinical practice for mental health care providers, yet traditional diagnostic systems have well-known shortcomings, including inadequate reliability, high comorbidity, and marked within-diagnosis heterogeneity. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a data-driven, hierarchically based alternative to traditional classifications that conceptualizes psychopathology as a set of dimensions organized into increasingly broad, transdiagnostic spectra. Prior work has shown that using a dimensional approach improves reliability and validity, but translating a model like HiTOP into a workable system that is useful for health care providers remains a major challenge.Method
The present work outlines the HiTOP model and describes the core principles to guide its integration into clinical practice.Results
Potential advantages and limitations of the HiTOP model for clinical utility are reviewed, including with respect to case conceptualization and treatment planning. A HiTOP approach to practice is illustrated and contrasted with an approach based on traditional nosology. Common barriers to using HiTOP in real-world health care settings and solutions to these barriers are discussed.Conclusions
HiTOP represents a viable alternative to classifying mental illness that can be integrated into practice today, although research is needed to further establish its utility. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%