Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
The SSB-positive/SSA-negative antibody profile is not associated with key phenotypic features of Sjögren's syndrome.
- Baer, Alan N;
- McAdams DeMarco, Mara;
- Shiboski, Stephen C;
- Lam, Mi Y;
- Challacombe, Stephen;
- Daniels, Troy E;
- Dong, Yi;
- Greenspan, John S;
- Kirkham, Bruce W;
- Lanfranchi, Hector E;
- Schiødt, Morten;
- Srinivasan, Muthiah;
- Umehara, Hisanori;
- Vivino, Frederick B;
- Vollenweider, Cristina F;
- Zhao, Yan;
- Criswell, Lindsey A;
- Shiboski, Caroline H;
- Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) Research Groups
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206683Abstract
Objective
To determine whether the Sjögren's syndrome B (SSB)-positive/Sjögren's syndrome A (SSA)-negative antibody profile is associated with key phenotypic features of SS.Methods
Among registrants in the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) with possible or established SS, we compared anti-SSA/anti-SSB reactivity profiles against concurrent phenotypic features. We fitted logistic regression models to explore the association between anti-SSA/anti-SSB reactivity profile and each key SS phenotypic feature, controlling for potential confounders.Results
Among 3297 participants, 2061 (63%) had negative anti-SSA/anti-SSB, 1162 (35%) had anti-SSA with or without anti-SSB, and 74 (2%) anti-SSB alone. Key SS phenotypic features were more prevalent and had measures indicative of greater disease activity in those participants with anti-SSA, either alone or with anti-SSB, than in those with anti-SSB alone or negative SSA/SSB serology. These between-group differences were highly significant and not explained by confounding by age, race/ethnicity or gender. Participants with anti-SSB alone were comparable to those with negative SSA/SSB serology in their association with these key phenotypic features. Among SICCA participants classified with SS on the basis of the American-European Consensus Group or American College of Rheumatology criteria, only 2% required the anti-SSB-alone test result to meet these criteria.Conclusions
The presence of anti-SSB, without anti-SSA antibodies, had no significant association with SS phenotypic features, relative to seronegative participants. The solitary presence of anti-SSB antibodies does not provide any more support than negative serology for the diagnosis of SS. This serological profile should thus be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice and potentially eliminated from future classification criteria.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%