Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
What Else Is Wrong With Non-Monotonic Logics? Representational and Informational Shortcomings
Abstract
Non-montonic logics have been used recently for a variety of A.I. purposes, including belief revision and default reasoning in question-answering and exper systems. This paper argues that by their nature, such systems dicard information which has a role in human belief systems. In particular, systems which use non-monotonic reasoning lose the distinction between fully justified inferences and reasonable presumptions, in the process losing the ability to record failed expectations as such, an ability which provides a useful measure of salience for A.I. systems.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
If you recently published or updated this item, please wait up to 30 minutes for the PDF to appear here.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%