Variations in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Performance and Outcomes in Ohio
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding characteristics of top-performing emergency medical service (EMS) agencies and hospitals can be an important tool for improving community out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care. We compared deidentified EMS and hospital-level variations in OHCA performance and outcomes in Ohio.
Methods: We analyzed adult OHCA data from the 2019 Ohio Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (Ohio CARES). We limited the analysis to EMS agencies and receiving hospitals with ≥10 OHCA episodes. The primary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge. We compared OHCA outcomes between EMS agencies using linear mixed models, with EMS agency as a random effect and adjusting for Utstein variables. We repeated the analysis by receiving hospital. We compared EMS agency population demographics, response times, and resuscitation characteristics of the top 10% of agencies against remaining agencies using chi-squared tests.
Results: We included 2,841 OHCA among 44 EMS agencies in our analysis. The ROSC varied three-fold; mean 27.9%, range 15.8%-51.0%. Among 40 hospitals, survival varied two-fold; mean 12.9%, range 8.1%-19.0%. Top-performing EMS agencies included both medium- and large-sized agencies that tended to treat younger patients (59 vs 62 years, P<0.01) in public areas (15.7% vs 12.3%, P<0.01). There were no differences in bystander-witnessed arrest, bystander cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), or EMS response time. However, top-performing EMS agencies used less mechanical CPR (61.7% vs 76.0%, P<0.01) and were more successful in advanced airway placement (89.6% vs 74.8% P<0.01).
Conclusions: The ROSC and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varied across EMS agencies and hospitals in Ohio. Top-performing EMS agencies exhibited unique demographic characteristics, used less mechanical CPR, and were more successful in airway placement. These variations in OHCA care and outcomes can indicate opportunities for system improvement in Ohio.