Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Safety and Efficacy of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab Alone or in Combination in Patients with Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
- Kelly, Ronan J;
- Lee, Jeeyun;
- Bang, Yung-Jue;
- Almhanna, Khaldoun;
- Blum-Murphy, Mariela;
- Catenacci, Daniel VT;
- Chung, Hyun Cheol;
- Wainberg, Zev A;
- Gibson, Michael K;
- Lee, Keun-Wook;
- Bendell, Johanna C;
- Denlinger, Crystal S;
- Chee, Cheng Ean;
- Omori, Takeshi;
- Leidner, Rom;
- Lenz, Heinz-Josef;
- Chao, Yee;
- Rebelatto, Marlon C;
- Brohawn, Philip Z;
- He, Peng;
- McDevitt, Jennifer;
- Sheth, Siddharth;
- Englert, Judson M;
- Ku, Geoffrey Y
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2443Abstract
Purpose
This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II study assessed durvalumab and tremelimumab in combination or as monotherapy for chemotherapy-refractory gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.Patients and methods
Second-line patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive durvalumab plus tremelimumab (arm A), or durvalumab (arm B) or tremelimumab monotherapy (arm C), and third-line patients received durvalumab plus tremelimumab (arm D). A tumor-based IFNγ gene signature was prospectively evaluated as a potential predictive biomarker in second- and third-line patients receiving the combination (arm E). The coprimary endpoints were objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months.Results
A total of 113 patients were treated: 6 in phase Ib and 107 (arm A, 27; arm B, 24; arm C, 12; arm D, 25; arm E, 19) in phase II. Overall response rates were 7.4%, 0%, 8.3%, 4.0%, and 15.8% in the five arms, respectively. PFS rates at 6 months were 6.1%, 0%, 20%, 15%, and 0%, and 12-month overall survival rates were 37.0%, 4.6%, 22.9%, 38.8%, and NA, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 17%, 4%, 42%, 16%, and 11% of patients, respectively.Conclusions
Response rates were low regardless of monotherapy or combination strategies. No new safety signals were identified. Including use of a tumor-based IFNγ signature and change in baseline and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA are clinically feasible and may be novel strategies to improve treatment response in this difficult-to-treat population.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%