Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Comments on “Economic Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation vs Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Labor Cost Model”

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a response to the author's paper, titled “Economic Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation vs Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Labor Cost Model”. We agree that Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has been demonstrated to be a non-inferior assessment for confirmation of successful above the diaphragm Central Venous Catheter (CVC) placement when compared to Chest X-ray (CXR). From a cost analysis standpoint, we believe there are significant areas of direct and indirect costs that would demonstrate an advantage to the use of POCUS versus CXR.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View