Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Comparative risk of pulmonary adverse events with transfusion of pathogen reduced and conventional platelet components
- Snyder, Edward L;
- Wheeler, Allison P;
- Refaai, Majed;
- Cohn, Claudia S;
- Poisson, Jessica;
- Fontaine, Magali;
- Sehl, Mary;
- Nooka, Ajay K;
- Uhl, Lynne;
- Spinella, Philip;
- Fenelus, Maly;
- Liles, Darla;
- Coyle, Thomas;
- Becker, Joanne;
- Jeng, Michael;
- Gehrie, Eric A;
- Spencer, Bryan R;
- Young, Pampee;
- Johnson, Andrew;
- O'Brien, Jennifer J;
- Schiller, Gary J;
- Roback, John D;
- Malynn, Elizabeth;
- Jackups, Ronald;
- Avecilla, Scott T;
- Lin, Jin‐Sying;
- Liu, Kathy;
- Bentow, Stanley;
- Peng, Ho‐Lan;
- Varrone, Jeanne;
- Benjamin, Richard J;
- Corash, Laurence M
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.16987Abstract
Background
Platelet transfusion carries risk of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI). Pathogen reduction of platelet components (PRPC) is designed to reduce TTI. Pulmonary adverse events (AEs), including transfusion-related acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occur with platelet transfusion.Study design
An open label, sequential cohort study of transfusion-dependent hematology-oncology patients was conducted to compare pulmonary safety of PRPC with conventional PC (CPC). The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment-emergent assisted mechanical ventilation (TEAMV) by non-inferiority. Secondary outcomes included: time to TEAMV, ARDS, pulmonary AEs, peri-transfusion AE, hemorrhagic AE, transfusion reactions (TRs), PC and red blood cell (RBC) use, and mortality.Results
By modified intent-to-treat (mITT), 1068 patients received 5277 PRPC and 1223 patients received 5487 CPC. The cohorts had similar demographics, primary disease, and primary therapy. PRPC were non-inferior to CPC for TEAMV (treatment difference -1.7%, 95% CI: (-3.3% to -0.1%); odds ratio = 0.53, 95% CI: (0.30, 0.94). The cumulative incidence of TEAMV for PRPC (2.9%) was significantly less than CPC (4.6%, p = .039). The incidence of ARDS was less, but not significantly different, for PRPC (1.0% vs. 1.8%, p = .151; odds ratio = 0.57, 95% CI: (0.27, 1.18). AE, pulmonary AE, and mortality were not different between cohorts. TRs were similar for PRPC and CPC (8.3% vs. 9.7%, p = .256); and allergic TR were significantly less with PRPC (p = .006). PC and RBC use were not increased with PRPC.Discussion
PRPC demonstrated reduced TEAMV with no excess treatment-related pulmonary morbidity.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%