UC San Diego

Context: Equianalgesic tools are commonly utilized to guide dose of analgesic therapy, but there is no national consensus on equianalgesic calculations in the United States. Objectives: To propose a summary of current opioid equianalgesic data that include variations and trends among national institutions. Methods: Opioid equianalgesic tools were obtained between May and September 2021. For meperidine, tramadol, codeine, hydrocodone, morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, hydromorphone, levorphanol, fentanyl, and tapentadol, details of adjustment for incomplete tolerance, opioid equianalgesic ratios, and formulation types were collected and analyzed. Baseline opioid pharmaco kinetic data were obtained through manufacturer labels on FDA databases, including half-life (T1/2), volume of distribution (Vd), clearance (Cl), area under the curve (AUC), max concentration (Cmax), and time to max concentration (Tmax). Results: Thirty-two institutions equianalgesic tools were included with each study opioid appearing on an average of 23 institutions tools. Few tools contained guidance on levorphanol or tapentadol; or included minimum and maximum recommended doses. All tools included guidance on fentanyl, hydromorphone, oxycodone, morphine, and hydrocodone. A minority of tools included guidance on cross-tolerance considerations (n = 12, 37.5%). Oral-tramadol-to-oral-morphine and oral-hydromorphone-to-intravenous (IV)-hydromorphone had the largest variances across equianalgesic tools (6.7 ± 2.8 and 4.06 ± 1.2 mg, respectively). Conclusion: Opioid equianalgesia tools from across the United States demonstrated significant variation in their inclusion of guidance on adjustment for incomplete cross-tolerance, oral-to-IV, and oral-to-oral opioid equianalgesic ratios, and which opioids and formulations were listed. Tramadol and hydromorphone had the most variation in their equianalgesic guidance among the opioids.