UCSF

Purpose

Genomic testing is crucial in cancer risk identification, diagnosis, and treatment. However, health care implementation is challenging, even for tests covered by insurance. US payers are important health care participants and may contribute to addressing implementation challenges. We explored whether and how payers consider their role in genomic test implementation, and the perspectives of nonpayer stakeholders on payers' participation.

Methods

We conducted a group interview with private payers (N = 12) to elucidate views on their role in genomic test implementation, implementation challenges, and potential solutions. Subsequently, we conducted individual interviews (N = 10) with nonpayer stakeholders-five cancer advocacy groups and five medical societies working in cancer, examining their reactions to payer input and capturing additional ideas. Qualitative research methods were used to frame the study and analyze results.

Results

Payers considered cancer genomics implementation important and expressed willingness and ability to be involved. They articulated specific challenges relevant to them, including underutilization of covered tests in clinical practice, inequitable test use, and inconsistencies across guidelines, and suggested specific solutions to collaborate on with other stakeholders. Stakeholders viewed payers' participation in implementation as appropriate and feasible, expressed willingness to work with payers where relevant, and concurred with the key challenges noted by payers. Stakeholders' agreement with payers' solutions varied, but they offered additional ideas for addressing challenges.

Conclusion

Both payers and other stakeholders considered payers' role in addressing genomics implementation challenges appropriate and feasible, and offered specific avenues for payer participation. Our findings inform efforts by payers and other stakeholders to address broad health care implementation. They may also help precision oncology professionals, cancer centers, and health systems to frame their own implementation efforts and influence a broader policy and implementation agenda.