Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Test–retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measures by breast DWI: Results from the ACRIN 6698 trial
- Newitt, David C;
- Zhang, Zheng;
- Gibbs, Jessica E;
- Partridge, Savannah C;
- Chenevert, Thomas L;
- Rosen, Mark A;
- Bolan, Patrick J;
- Marques, Helga S;
- Aliu, Sheye;
- Li, Wen;
- Cimino, Lisa;
- Joe, Bonnie N;
- Umphrey, Heidi;
- Ojeda‐Fournier, Haydee;
- Dogan, Basak;
- Oh, Karen;
- Abe, Hiroyuki;
- Drukteinis, Jennifer;
- Esserman, Laura J;
- Hylton, Nola M;
- Investigators, for the ACRIN Trial Team and I‐SPY 2 TRIAL
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26539Abstract
Background
Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI is a promising technique for cancer characterization and treatment monitoring. Knowledge of the reproducibility of DWI metrics in breast tumors is necessary to apply DWI as a clinical biomarker.Purpose
To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of breast tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in a multi-institution clinical trial setting, using standardized DWI protocols and quality assurance (QA) procedures.Study type
Prospective.Subjects
In all, 89 women from nine institutions undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer.Field strength/sequence
DWI was acquired before and after patient repositioning using a four b-value, single-shot echo-planar sequence at 1.5T or 3.0T.Assessment
A QA procedure by trained operators assessed artifacts, fat suppression, and signal-to-noise ratio, and determine study analyzability. Mean tumor ADC was measured via manual segmentation of the multislice tumor region referencing DWI and contrast-enhanced images. Twenty cases were evaluated multiple times to assess intra- and interoperator variability. Segmentation similarity was assessed via the Sørenson-Dice similarity coefficient.Statistical tests
Repeatability and reproducibility were evaluated using within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), agreement index (AI), and repeatability coefficient (RC). Correlations were measured by Pearson's correlation coefficients.Results
In all, 71 cases (80%) passed QA evaluation: 44 at 1.5T, 27 at 3.0T; 60 pretreatment, 11 after 3 weeks of taxane-based treatment. ADC repeatability was excellent: wCV = 4.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0, 5.7%), ICC = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95, 0.98), AI = 0.83 (95% CI 0.76, 0.87), and RC = 0.16 * 10-3 mm2 /sec (95% CI 0.13, 0.19). The results were similar across field strengths and timepoint subgroups. Reproducibility was excellent: interreader ICC = 0.92 (95% CI 0.80, 0.97) and intrareader ICC = 0.91 (95% CI 0.78, 0.96).Data conclusion
Breast tumor ADC can be measured with excellent repeatability and reproducibility in a multi-institution setting using a standardized protocol and QA procedure. Improvements to DWI image quality could reduce loss of data in clinical trials.Level of evidence
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1617-1628.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
If you recently published or updated this item, please wait up to 30 minutes for the PDF to appear here.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%