Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Family, nurse, and physician beliefs on family‐centered rounds: A 21‐site study
- Patel, Shilpa J;
- Khan, Alisa;
- Bass, Ellen J;
- Graham, Dionne;
- Baird, Jennifer;
- Anderson, Michele;
- Calaman, Sharon;
- Cray, Sharon;
- Destino, Lauren;
- Fegley, April;
- Goldstein, Jenna;
- Johnson, Tyler;
- Kocolas, Irene;
- Lewis, Kheyandra D;
- Liss, Isabella;
- Markle, Peggy;
- O'Toole, Jennifer K;
- Rosenbluth, Glenn;
- Srivastava, Raj;
- Vara, Tiffany;
- Landrigan, Christopher P;
- Spector, Nancy D;
- Knighton, Andrew J
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.12962Abstract
Background
Variation exists in family-centered rounds (FCR).Objective
We sought to understand patient/family and clinician FCR beliefs/attitudes and practices to support implementation efforts.Designs, settings and participants
Patients/families and clinicians at 21 geographically diverse US community/academic pediatric teaching hospitals participated in a prospective cohort dissemination and implementation study.Intervention
We inquired about rounding beliefs/attitudes, practices, and demographics using a 26-question survey coproduced with family/nurse/attending-physician collaborators, informed by prior research and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Main outcome and measures
Out of 2578 individuals, 1647 (64%) responded to the survey; of these, 1313 respondents participated in FCR and were included in analyses (616 patients/families, 243 nurses, 285 resident physicians, and 169 attending physicians). Beliefs/attitudes regarding the importance of FCR elements varied by role, with resident physicians rating the importance of several FCR elements lower than others. For example, on adjusted multivariable analysis, attending physicians (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-7.8) and nurses (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.4) were much more likely than resident physicians to report family participation on rounds as very/extremely important. Clinician support for key FCR elements was higher than self-reported practice (e.g., 88% believed family participation was important on rounds; 68% reported it often/always occurred). In practice, key elements of FCR were reported to often/always occur only 23%-70% of the time.Result
Support for nurse and family participation in FCR is high among clinicians but varies by role. Physicians, particularly resident physicians, endorse several FCR elements as less important than nurses and patients/families. The gap between attitudes and practice and between clinician types suggests that attitudinal, structural, and cultural barriers impede FCR.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%