Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Review of Publications from Top Ophthalmology Journals
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2024.100681Abstract
Purpose
To review and evaluate the current literature on the application and impact of large language models (LLMs) in the field of ophthalmology, focusing on studies published in high-ranking ophthalmology journals.Design
This is a retrospective review of published articles.Participants
This study did not involve human participation.Methods
Articles published in the first quartile (Q1) of ophthalmology journals on Scimago Journal & Country Rank discussing different LLMs up to June 7, 2024, were reviewed, parsed, and analyzed.Main outcome measures
All available articles were parsed and analyzed, which included the article and author characteristics and data regarding the LLM used and its applications, focusing on its use in medical education, clinical assistance, research, and patient education.Results
There were 35 Q1-ranked journals identified, 19 of which contained articles discussing LLMs, with 101 articles eligible for review. One-third were original investigations (32%; 32/101), with an average of 5.3 authors per article. The United States (50.4%; 51/101) was the most represented country, followed by the United Kingdom (25.7%; 26/101) and Canada (16.8%; 17/101). ChatGPT was the most used LLM among the studies, with different versions discussed and compared. Large language model applications were discussed relevant to their implications in medical education, clinical assistance, research, and patient education.Conclusions
The numerous publications on the use of LLM in ophthalmology can provide valuable insights for stakeholders and consumers of these applications. Large language models present significant opportunities for advancement in ophthalmology, particularly in team science, education, clinical assistance, and research. Although LLMs show promise, they also show challenges such as performance inconsistencies, bias, and ethical concerns. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing artificial intelligence improvement, ethical guidelines, and multidisciplinary collaboration.Financial disclosures
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
If you recently published or updated this item, please wait up to 30 minutes for the PDF to appear here.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%