Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Multiplex Tissue Imaging Harmonization: A Multicenter Experience from CIMAC-CIDC Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Network
- Akturk, Guray;
- Parra, Edwin R;
- Gjini, Evisa;
- Lako, Ana;
- Lee, J Jack;
- Neuberg, Donna;
- Zhang, Jiexin;
- Yao, Shen;
- Laface, Ilaria;
- Rogic, Anita;
- Chen, Pei-Hsuan;
- Sanchez-Espiridion, Beatriz;
- Del Valle, Diane M;
- Moravec, Radim;
- Kinders, Robert;
- Hudgens, Courtney;
- Wu, Catherine;
- Wistuba, Ignacio I;
- Thurin, Magdalena;
- Hewitt, Stephen M;
- Rodig, Scott;
- Gnjatic, Sacha;
- Tetzlaff, Michael T
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2051Abstract
Purpose
The Cancer Immune Monitoring and Analysis Centers - Cancer Immunologic Data Commons (CIMAC-CIDC) network supported by the NCI Cancer Moonshot initiative was established to provide correlative analyses for clinical trials in cancer immunotherapy, using state-of-the-art technology. Fundamental to this initiative is implementation of multiplex IHC assays to define the composition and distribution of immune infiltrates within tumors in the context of their potential role as biomarkers. A critical unanswered question involves the relative fidelity of such assays to reliably quantify tumor-associated immune cells across different platforms.Experimental design
Three CIMAC sites compared across their laboratories: (i) image analysis algorithms, (ii) image acquisition platforms, (iii) multiplex staining protocols. Two distinct high-dimensional approaches were employed: multiplexed IHC consecutive staining on single slide (MICSSS) and multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF). To eliminate variables potentially impacting assay performance, we completed a multistep harmonization process, first comparing assay performance using independent protocols followed by the integration of laboratory-specific protocols and finally, validating this harmonized approach in an independent set of tissues.Results
Data generated at the final validation step showed an intersite Spearman correlation coefficient (r) of ≥0.85 for each marker within and across tissue types, with an overall low average coefficient of variation ≤0.1.Conclusions
Our results support interchangeability of protocols and platforms to deliver robust, and comparable data using similar tissue specimens and confirm that CIMAC-CIDC analyses may therefore be used with confidence for statistical associations with clinical outcomes largely independent of site, antibody selection, protocol, and platform across different sites.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%