Open Access Policy Deposits

Parent: UCLA Civil and Environmental Engineering

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for October, 2024 through January, 2025

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
0fz7h64jEstimating Undrained Strength of Clays from Direct Shear Testing at Fast Displacement Rates1822615614.3%
36t9s0mpFactors and Processes Affecting Delta Levee System Vulnerability1822315912.6%
90b2c6w9Implications of mHVSR Spatial Variability on Site Response Predictability162956758.6%
7zq911jzA general method to synthesize and sinter bulk ceramics in seconds1341161886.6%
70n5p7mcReverse osmosis membrane biofouling: causes, consequences and countermeasures12391147.3%
9t09660mSeismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical aspects104851981.7%
1qm5j970A screen analysis procedure for seismic slope stability100564456.0%
8bj493bcSettlements and excess pore pressure generation in peaty soils under embankments during cyclic loading90226824.4%
2bx8311xUnsupervised machine learning for detecting soil layer boundaries from cone penetration test data87315635.6%
3037q1t6Nonlinear Site Amplification as Function of 30m Shear Wave Velocity84612372.6%
2sc5g220Site-to-Site Standard Deviation Model for Central and Eastern North America833803.6%
91z0j94cCalcination-free production of calcium hydroxide at sub-boiling temperatures8397410.8%
1x6139kdRecommendations on best available science for the United States National Seismic Hazard Model81107112.3%
1gz7c50wPrediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects80275333.8%
5w9864xbFracture Toughness of Silicate Glasses: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations805756.3%
3bn528xcNGA-SUB GROUND MOTION DATABASE79245530.4%
5fc796tkA Constitutive Model Controlling Damping for 2D and 3D Site Response792772.5%
8gv2j7drUpdated ground motion spectral matching requirements in the 2015 NEHRP recommended seismic provisions79641581.0%
33r8887mLaboratory Component of Next-Generation Liquefaction Project Database752732.7%
5r53b2htAuthor Correction: A critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States73195426.0%
7c5870pfA general framework for modeling subregional path effects7286411.1%
7db3d49zNonlinear seismic ground response analysis: code usage protocols and verification against vertical array data68561282.4%
049660rmA proposed seismic velocity profile database model645597.8%
2546f8hwPanel Review of Ground Motion Characterization Model in 2023 NSHM63144922.2%
5ch0f8mgFull Scale Cyclic Testing of Foundation Support Systems for Highway Bridges. Part II: Abutment Backwalls63342954.0%
8xx7w310Failure of Tapo Canyon Tailings Dam6385512.7%
8q37k1gpA critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States62352756.5%
0jh8z8jjDocumentation of soil conditions at liquefaction and non-liquefaction sites from 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake57144324.6%
5427j7f3Applications of non-ergodic site response in ground motion modeling5374613.2%
48t8k8cdSubsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey52302257.7%
84v1r3t8Strong ground motions and damage patterns from the 1999 Duzce earthquake in Turkey52391375.0%
8092q930UV exposure to PET microplastics increases their downward mobility in stormwater biofilters undergoing freeze–thaw cycles51242747.1%
0cx1452cVariations between foundation-level and free-field earthquake ground motions5084216.0%
0jk5d8nhImpacts of 2020 Beirut Explosion on Port Infrastructure and Nearby Buildings50133726.0%
12f5332mUse of Exact Solutions of Wave Propagation Problems to Guide Implementation of Nonlinear Seismic Ground Response Analysis Procedures49153430.6%
3wm8s4pgFindings from a decade of ground motion simulation validation research and a path forward49272255.1%
6z40d9tdOpenSees Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation Modeling of Pile Groups in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground in Centrifuge Tests.49222744.9%
6f7990mdEmpirical site response of Mexico City through regionalization of global subduction GMMs48153331.3%
8mk017thKinematic soil-structure interaction effects from building and free-field seismic arrays in Japan48153331.3%
1sw070c3FEM Analysis of Dynamic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground47272057.4%
3nd293hkAn overview of the great Alaska earthquake of 1964.47341372.3%
280468kcEvaluating connected vehicle-based weather responsive management strategies using weather-sensitive microscopic simulation46341273.9%
44c450q3Molecular mechanisms of thickness-dependent water desalination in polyamide reverse-osmosis membranes46351176.1%
9731j6bzReliability of low frequency mHVSR ordinates4673915.2%
0x71n55hCPT-Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of In Situ Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential45321371.1%
1td7368mAnalysis of foundation damping from theoretical models and forced vibration testing4540588.9%
24w4q3jxRocking Response of Free-Standing Blocks Under Cycloidal Pulses45103522.2%
3mr1w33tEngineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motion Coherency and Amplitude Variability44212347.7%
5rt430c7The multi-scale damage evolution of nano-modified concrete under the cold region tunnel environment based on micromechanical model44143031.8%
7qp9w0tbSeismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings4437784.1%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.