UCLA Civil and Environmental Engineering

Parent: UCLA

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for September through December, 2024

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
0fz7h64jEstimating Undrained Strength of Clays from Direct Shear Testing at Fast Displacement Rates1962816814.3%
36t9s0mpFactors and Processes Affecting Delta Levee System Vulnerability1822615614.3%
90b2c6w9Implications of mHVSR Spatial Variability on Site Response Predictability150906060.0%
7zq911jzA general method to synthesize and sinter bulk ceramics in seconds1371261192.0%
70n5p7mcReverse osmosis membrane biofouling: causes, consequences and countermeasures11091018.2%
9t09660mSeismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical aspects101792278.2%
8bj493bcSettlements and excess pore pressure generation in peaty soils under embankments during cyclic loading93237024.7%
1qm5j970A screen analysis procedure for seismic slope stability91523957.1%
1x6139kdRecommendations on best available science for the United States National Seismic Hazard Model81136816.0%
5ch0f8mgFull Scale Cyclic Testing of Foundation Support Systems for Highway Bridges. Part II: Abutment Backwalls81483359.3%
5w9864xbFracture Toughness of Silicate Glasses: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations761751.3%
5fc796tkA Constitutive Model Controlling Damping for 2D and 3D Site Response752732.7%
1gz7c50wPrediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects74235131.1%
3037q1t6Nonlinear Site Amplification as Function of 30m Shear Wave Velocity74502467.6%
33r8887mLaboratory Component of Next-Generation Liquefaction Project Database701691.4%
7db3d49zNonlinear seismic ground response analysis: code usage protocols and verification against vertical array data69551479.7%
5r53b2htAuthor Correction: A critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States68135519.1%
91z0j94cCalcination-free production of calcium hydroxide at sub-boiling temperatures6776010.4%
8gv2j7drUpdated ground motion spectral matching requirements in the 2015 NEHRP recommended seismic provisions64521281.3%
2bx8311xUnsupervised machine learning for detecting soil layer boundaries from cone penetration test data62243838.7%
2546f8hwPanel Review of Ground Motion Characterization Model in 2023 NSHM61164526.2%
7c5870pfA general framework for modeling subregional path effects5975211.9%
3bn528xcNGA-SUB GROUND MOTION DATABASE58154325.9%
2sc5g220Site-to-Site Standard Deviation Model for Central and Eastern North America571561.8%
8xx7w310Failure of Tapo Canyon Tailings Dam575528.8%
049660rmA proposed seismic velocity profile database model5564910.9%
0jh8z8jjDocumentation of soil conditions at liquefaction and non-liquefaction sites from 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake55124321.8%
3nd293hkAn overview of the great Alaska earthquake of 1964.54411375.9%
0cx1452cVariations between foundation-level and free-field earthquake ground motions5264611.5%
8092q930UV exposure to PET microplastics increases their downward mobility in stormwater biofilters undergoing freeze–thaw cycles51262551.0%
3wm8s4pgFindings from a decade of ground motion simulation validation research and a path forward50252550.0%
48t8k8cdSubsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey50272354.0%
5427j7f3Applications of non-ergodic site response in ground motion modeling4864212.5%
0x71n55hCPT-Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of In Situ Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential47331470.2%
1sw070c3FEM Analysis of Dynamic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground46232350.0%
7qp9w0tbSeismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings4539686.7%
12f5332mUse of Exact Solutions of Wave Propagation Problems to Guide Implementation of Nonlinear Seismic Ground Response Analysis Procedures44143031.8%
84v1r3t8Strong ground motions and damage patterns from the 1999 Duzce earthquake in Turkey4436881.8%
0jk5d8nhImpacts of 2020 Beirut Explosion on Port Infrastructure and Nearby Buildings43103323.3%
9731j6bzReliability of low frequency mHVSR ordinates4383518.6%
1td7368mAnalysis of foundation damping from theoretical models and forced vibration testing4236685.7%
44c450q3Molecular mechanisms of thickness-dependent water desalination in polyamide reverse-osmosis membranes4133880.5%
8mk017thKinematic soil-structure interaction effects from building and free-field seismic arrays in Japan41132831.7%
3mr1w33tEngineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motion Coherency and Amplitude Variability39162341.0%
6f7990mdEmpirical site response of Mexico City through regionalization of global subduction GMMs39122730.8%
6z40d9tdOpenSees Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation Modeling of Pile Groups in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground in Centrifuge Tests.39162341.0%
74h0v84vParameter Identification of Framed Structures Using an Improved Finite Element Model Updating Method—Part I: Formulation and Validation3963315.4%
8q37k1gpA critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States39192048.7%
24w4q3jxRocking Response of Free-Standing Blocks Under Cycloidal Pulses36102627.8%
3j47t3wrUnloading-reloading rule for nonlinear site response analysis36241266.7%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.