UCLA Civil and Environmental Engineering

Parent: UCLA

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for December, 2024 through March, 2025

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
36t9s0mpFactors and Processes Affecting Delta Levee System Vulnerability1632314014.1%
0fz7h64jEstimating Undrained Strength of Clays from Direct Shear Testing at Fast Displacement Rates1501913112.7%
7zq911jzA general method to synthesize and sinter bulk ceramics in seconds127903770.9%
70n5p7mcReverse osmosis membrane biofouling: causes, consequences and countermeasures123111128.9%
8gv2j7drUpdated ground motion spectral matching requirements in the 2015 NEHRP recommended seismic provisions115882776.5%
2bx8311xUnsupervised machine learning for detecting soil layer boundaries from cone penetration test data102356734.3%
9t09660mSeismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical aspects100792179.0%
8bj493bcSettlements and excess pore pressure generation in peaty soils under embankments during cyclic loading97247324.7%
8q37k1gpA critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States89533659.6%
91z0j94cCalcination-free production of calcium hydroxide at sub-boiling temperatures898819.0%
2sc5g220Site-to-Site Standard Deviation Model for Central and Eastern North America886826.8%
1gz7c50wPrediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects86266030.2%
3bn528xcNGA-SUB GROUND MOTION DATABASE84206423.8%
5fc796tkA Constitutive Model Controlling Damping for 2D and 3D Site Response833803.6%
5w9864xbFracture Toughness of Silicate Glasses: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations8297311.0%
280468kcEvaluating connected vehicle-based weather responsive management strategies using weather-sensitive microscopic simulation78611778.2%
1qm5j970A screen analysis procedure for seismic slope stability76413553.9%
33r8887mLaboratory Component of Next-Generation Liquefaction Project Database765716.6%
1x6139kdRecommendations on best available science for the United States National Seismic Hazard Model75116414.7%
3037q1t6Nonlinear Site Amplification as Function of 30m Shear Wave Velocity75403553.3%
2546f8hwPanel Review of Ground Motion Characterization Model in 2023 NSHM74175723.0%
7db3d49zNonlinear seismic ground response analysis: code usage protocols and verification against vertical array data70511972.9%
049660rmA proposed seismic velocity profile database model685637.4%
8092q930UV exposure to PET microplastics increases their downward mobility in stormwater biofilters undergoing freeze–thaw cycles68373154.4%
8xx7w310Failure of Tapo Canyon Tailings Dam6475710.9%
5r53b2htAuthor Correction: A critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States63224134.9%
12f5332mUse of Exact Solutions of Wave Propagation Problems to Guide Implementation of Nonlinear Seismic Ground Response Analysis Procedures61204132.8%
3mr1w33tEngineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motion Coherency and Amplitude Variability61293247.5%
5ch0f8mgFull Scale Cyclic Testing of Foundation Support Systems for Highway Bridges. Part II: Abutment Backwalls59342557.6%
0jk5d8nhImpacts of 2020 Beirut Explosion on Port Infrastructure and Nearby Buildings58184031.0%
1td7368mAnalysis of foundation damping from theoretical models and forced vibration testing57401770.2%
7c5870pfA general framework for modeling subregional path effects57104717.5%
4580n511Performance of NGA-East GMMs and Site Amplification Models Relative to CENA Ground Motions5665010.7%
84v1r3t8Strong ground motions and damage patterns from the 1999 Duzce earthquake in Turkey56381867.9%
7qp9w0tbSeismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings55342161.8%
44c450q3Molecular mechanisms of thickness-dependent water desalination in polyamide reverse-osmosis membranes54411375.9%
019523j6Assessment of soil-structure interaction modeling strategies for response history analysis of buildings53173632.1%
48t8k8cdSubsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey53351866.0%
7c82q4gfDesignSafe: New Cyberinfrastructure for Natural Hazards Engineering53312258.5%
28p3k1rjForced Vibration Testing of a Four-Story Reinforced Concrete Building Utilizing the nees@UCLA Mobile Field Laboratory5174413.7%
9731j6bzReliability of low frequency mHVSR ordinates5064412.0%
1hc2543nRadiation Damping of Shallow Foundations on Nonlinear Soil Medium493466.1%
0jh8z8jjDocumentation of soil conditions at liquefaction and non-liquefaction sites from 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake48143429.2%
3wm8s4pgFindings from a decade of ground motion simulation validation research and a path forward48242450.0%
5427j7f3Applications of non-ergodic site response in ground motion modeling4893918.8%
6g64x0rsA reverse-selective ion exchange membrane for the selective transport of phosphates via an outer-sphere complexation–diffusion pathway48351372.9%
90b2c6w9Implications of mHVSR Spatial Variability on Site Response Predictability48202841.7%
24w4q3jxRocking Response of Free-Standing Blocks Under Cycloidal Pulses47123525.5%
3nd293hkAn overview of the great Alaska earthquake of 1964.47321568.1%
0cx1452cVariations between foundation-level and free-field earthquake ground motions4673915.2%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.