Earthquake Engineering
Parent: UCLA Civil and Environmental Engineering
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for October, 2024 through January, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8mk017th | Kinematic soil-structure interaction effects from building and free-field seismic arrays in Japan | 48 | 15 | 33 | 31.3% |
| 3mr1w33t | Engineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motion Coherency and Amplitude Variability | 44 | 21 | 23 | 47.7% |
| 8b43q93s | Finite Element Modeling of Shallow Foundations on Nonlinear Soil Medium | 36 | 4 | 32 | 11.1% |
| 1hc2543n | Radiation Damping of Shallow Foundations on Nonlinear Soil Medium | 35 | 5 | 30 | 14.3% |
| 4pw1r476 | Implications of California vertical array data for the analysis of site response with 1D geotechnical modeling | 35 | 4 | 31 | 11.4% |
| 49d460v7 | Development of NGA-Subduction database | 34 | 18 | 16 | 52.9% |
| 8fm3h6rj | Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for a Dam Site in Calabria (Southern Italy) | 33 | 12 | 21 | 36.4% |
| 0r59p7bk | Site response in NEHRP Provisions and NGA models | 31 | 14 | 17 | 45.2% |
| 8374p3d3 | Development of geologic site classes for seismic site amplification for central and eastern North America | 31 | 6 | 25 | 19.4% |
| 019523j6 | Assessment of soil-structure interaction modeling strategies for response history analysis of buildings | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20.0% |
| 796433tx | Implementation of 1D Ground Response Analysis in Probabilistic Assessments of Ground Shaking Potential | 28 | 6 | 22 | 21.4% |
| 1db101h6 | Applicability of levee fragility functions developed from Japanese data to California’s Central Valley | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0.0% |
| 9m8075g1 | NGA-Subduction site database | 24 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 9zx5m1kc | Groundwater level evaluation for river flood control levees and its effect on seismic performance | 23 | 1 | 22 | 4.3% |
| 1963r6jf | Site effects in parametric ground motion models for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% |
| 86p6n9hg | Ground motion estimation for evaluation of levee performance in past earthquakes | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% |
| 9dj3t2fc | Critical evaluation of Italian strong motion data and comparison to NGA ground motion prediction equations | 17 | 7 | 10 | 41.2% |
| 4nm9q7ps | Probabilistic versus Deterministic Implementation of Nonlinear Site Factors in Seismic Hazard | 16 | 1 | 15 | 6.3% |
| 9pz1x513 | Implications of California Vertical Array Data for Modeling of Non-Ergodic Site Response | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% |
| 5t73x5tj | Incorporating Soil-Structure Interaction intoSeismic Response Analyses for Buildings | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% |
| 6pn9s2hg | Selection of a Global Set of GMPEs for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project | 14 | 4 | 10 | 28.6% |
| 6v9844m7 | ENGINEERING RECONNAISSANCE FOLLOWING THE AUGUST 24, 2016M6.0 CENTRAL ITALY EARTHQUAKE | 14 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% |
| 4qh4g53z | Remote monitoring of a model levee constructed on soft peaty organic soil | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% |
| 8602788p | Dynamic field fest of a model levee founded on peaty organic soil using an eccentric mass shaker | 12 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% |
| 2k73b70c | Comparison of ground motion attributes from 2011 Tohoku-oki mainshock and two subsequent events | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% |
| 64x0k6zd | Measurements of dynamic impedance for a model levee on peat | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.