Objective

To determine the importance of preburn adjustment, injury-related variables, and selection of coping style in various outcome measures using a biopsychosocial model.

Design

Longitudinal study.

Setting

Outpatient burn clinics.

Participants

Burn survivors (N=231) who participated in this study as part of a larger burn model system study of 645 patients with major burn injuries.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main outcome measures

The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey was used to assess preburn adjustment. Other outcome measures entered into the model included the Ways of Coping Checklist Revised, the Brief Symptom Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and the Davidson Trauma Scale.

Results

Correlational and mediational analyses revealed that preburn emotional health predicted better adjustment at year 1 and more posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms at year 2. Better preburn emotional health was also related to less use of avoidance coping strategies, which was found to be a mediator of the effect of preburn emotional health and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Burn injury characteristics were not significantly associated with psychological adjustment at either year 1 or year 2.

Conclusions

The results indicate that there is a complex relation between premorbid mental health and the selection of coping strategies that affect long-term adjustment in persons recovering from a burn injury. This relation seems to have greater effect on long-term outcomes than does preburn emotional or physical health alone or the severity of the burn.

The ABA pain guidelines were developed 14 years ago and have not been revised despite evolution in the practice of burn care. A sub-committee of the American Burn Association's Committee on the Organization and Delivery of Burn Care was created to revise the adult pain guidelines. A MEDLINE search of English-language publications from 1968 to 2018 was conducted using the keywords "burn pain," "treatment," and "assessment." Selected references were also used from the greater pain literature. Studies were graded by two members of the committee using Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine-Levels of Evidence. We then met as a group to determine expert consensus on a variety of topics related to treating pain in burn patients. Finally, we assessed gaps in the current knowledge and determined research questions that would aid in providing better recommendations for optimal pain management of the burn patient. The literature search produced 189 papers, 95 were found to be relevant to the assessment and treatment of burn pain. From the greater pain literature 151 references were included, totaling 246 papers being analyzed. Following this literature review, a meeting to establish expert consensus was held and 20 guidelines established in the areas of pain assessment, opioid medications, nonopioid medications, regional anesthesia, and nonpharmacologic treatments. There is increasing research on pain management modalities, but available studies are inadequate to create a true standard of care. We call for more burn specific research into modalities for burn pain control as well as research on multimodal pain control.