CARET is a multicenter, two-armed, double-masked randomized chemoprevention trial in Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Baltimore, Connecticut, and Irvine, to test whether oral administration of beta-carotene (30 mg/day) plus retinyl palmitate (25,000 IU/day) can decrease the incidence of lung cancer in high risk populations, namely, heavy smokers and asbestos-exposed workers. The intervention combines the antioxidant action of beta-carotene and the tumor suppressor mechanism of vitamin A. As of April 30, 1993, CARET had randomized 1,845 participants in the 1985-1988 pilot phase plus 13,260 "efficacy" participants since 1989; of these, 4,000 are asbestos-exposed males and 11,105 are smokers and former smokers (44% female). Accrual is complete everywhere except Irvine, which was the last center added (1991), and the safety profile of the regimen to date has been excellent. With 14,420 smokers, 4,010 asbestos-exposed participants, and 114,100 person-years through February 1998, we expect CARET to be capable of detecting a 23% reduction in lung cancer incidence in the two populations combined and 27, 49, 32, and 35% reductions in the smokers, female smokers, male smokers, and asbestos-exposed subgroups, respectively. CARET is highly complementary to the alpha-tocopherol-beta-carotene study in Finland and the Harvard Physicians Health Study (beta-carotene alone) in the National Cancer Institute portfolio of major cancer chemoprevention trials.

The Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial tested the effect of the combination of beta-carotene (30 mg) and retinyl palmitate (25,000 units) daily on the incidence of lung cancer in high-risk individuals. In study centers located in Seattle, WA; Portland, OR; and Irvine, CA, we recruited current and recent ex-cigarette smokers, aged 50-69 years. Our primary method of recruitment was by mailing study information and eligibility questionnaires to age-selected health insurance subscribers. A total of 1,216,549 subscriber households were contacted, which resulted in 16,449 enrollments and 12,184 randomizations. Other methods of recruitment yielded 1421 enrollments and 1002 randomizations. Seventy-four % of those participants who enrolled in the 3-month placebo run-in were randomized. The major reasons for nonrandomization once subjects were enrolled were: becoming ineligible (13%), concern about or development of side effects attributed to the study vitamins (18%), loss of interest or being too busy (23%), and not showing up at the appointed time or not willing to come to the study center (23%). Here, we discuss the reasons for nonparticipation and for subjects leaving the trial prior to randomization and possible modifications of trial design and procedures to address these problems. This recruitment approach provided a constant flow of potentially eligible participants, screened out many ineligible and uninterested persons prior to the scheduling of a study center visit, and ensured randomization of committed participants. A major limitation of this study was that the pool of minorities that was reached was small.

Lung cancer and cardiovascular disease are major causes of death in the United States. It has been proposed that carotenoids and retinoids are agents that may prevent these disorders.

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled primary prevention trial -- the Beta Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial -- involving a total of 18,314 smokers, former smokers, and workers exposed to asbestos. The effects of a combination of 30 mg of beta carotene per day and 25,000 IU of retinol (vitamin A) in the form of retinyl palmitate per day on the primary end point, the incidence of lung cancer, were compared with those of placebo.

A total of 388 new cases of lung cancer were diagnosed during the 73,135 person-years of follow-up (mean length of follow-up, 4.0 years). The active-treatment group had a relative risk of lung cancer of 1.28 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.57; P=0.02), as compared with the placebo group. There were no statistically significant differences in the risks of other types of cancer. In the active-treatment group, the relative risk of death from any cause was 1.17 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.33); of death from lung cancer, 1.46 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.00); and of death from cardiovascular disease, 1.26 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.61). On the basis of these findings, the randomized trial was stopped 21 months earlier than planned; follow-up will continue for another 5 years.

After an average of four years of supplementation, the combination of beta carotene and vitamin A had no benefit and may have had an adverse effect on the incidence of lung cancer and on the risk of death from lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, and any cause in smokers and workers exposed to asbestos.