Like other marine mammals, True seals (Family Phocidae) rely on acoustic cues for orientation, communication, and prey and predator detection. Because of their amphibious life histories, the auditory systems of seals must operate efficiently both in air and water—environments with very different physical characteristics. While all seals exhibit common evolutionary traits related to hearing, the extent of auditory adaptations varies between phylogenetic lineages and, in some cases, may differ among species. The functional significance of these differences remains to be resolved. The most complete dataset describing amphibious hearing in seals is for the Phocinae subfamily (most temperate and polar phocid species of the Northern Hemisphere). There are few hearing data available for seals from the Monachinae subfamily (the Southern Ocean seals, monk seals, and elephant seals). However, the limited evidence suggests potential subfamily-level differences in hearing. Additional audiometric measurements are needed within the Monachinae lineage of seals to inform our understanding of auditory adaptations from an evolutionary perspective.
The first two chapters of this dissertation aim to expand knowledge of amphibious hearing in seals—particularly from the lesser known Monachinae lineage—by utilizing classic behavioral methods with two individual Hawaiian monk seals (Neomonachus schauinslandi) conditioned to voluntarily participate in hearing trials. These efforts generated and validated the first terrestrial audiogram, provided the first auditory masking measurements, and resolved discrepancies between two prior underwater hearing profiles for monk seals. The findings suggest reduced terrestrial hearing sensitivity may be related to physiological differences in soft tissue within the peripheral auditory system among seal species, which could inhibit the reception of airborne sound. Together, the results confirm that the hearing abilities of monk seals differ from those of related species and are informative for evolutionary considerations of hearing in seals.
From an applied perspective, these hearing data suggest that terrestrial communication is limited for the species. However, a lack of data describing the amplitude of Hawaiian monk seal airborne vocalizations has precluded any communication range estimates. For Chapter 3, I describe the spectral characteristics of and provide the first source level measurements for low-frequency calls emitted by this species in air. These amplitude and spectral data are combined with hearing thresholds and representative ambient noise levels to estimate the distances over which these seals can effectively communicate with conspecifics. Findings suggest that terrestrial communication is limited by the poor hearing sensitivity and moderate vocal amplitudes of the species and is further constrained by ambient noise in the environment.
This series of audiometric measurements advances knowledge of acoustic sensitivity in an endangered species, contributes comparative information about hearing for a data-poor marine mammal lineage, and increases our understanding of the evolution of hearing in the amphibious true seals. Finally, by combining hearing data with information about sound production, we can better understand the acoustic communication system of Hawaiian monk seals, ultimately supporting conservation and management efforts for this endangered species.