Patients diagnosed with metastatic sarcoma have limited options for achieving both local and distant tumor control. While SBRT can achieve local control, distant response rates remain low. There is limited evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy for combining SBRT with concurrent PD-1 checkpoint blockade in metastatic sarcoma. In this prospective case-series, we examined five patients with metastatic sarcoma on pembrolizumab treated concurrently with SBRT from July 1, 2016-October 30, 2018. Acute and chronic toxicity were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 5.0). SBRT-treated tumor control was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1). With median follow-up of 14.9 months, three patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, one with intimal, and one with chondroblastic osteosarcoma received SBRT with concurrent pembrolizumab to 10 sites of metastatic disease. No grade 5 toxicities were observed. There was a single incidence of transient grade 4 lymphopenia which resolved without intervention. Grade 3 toxicities included anemia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia and colitis. One tumor demonstrated local progression after SBRT, and all others remained stable or with response. In conclusion, combining SBRT with PD-1 inhibition appeared to be safe in this patient population. Expected high rates of treated-tumor local control after SBRT were observed. Two of five patients demonstrated either enhanced local tumor regression, or possible abscopal effect.

For decades the field of radiation oncology has sought to improve the therapeutic ratio through innovations in physics, chemistry, and biology. To date, technological advancements in image guided beam delivery techniques have provided clinicians with their best options for improving this critical tool in cancer care. Medical physics has focused on the preferential targeting of tumors while minimizing the collateral dose to the surrounding normal tissues, yielding only incremental progress. However, recent developments involving ultra-high dose rate irradiation termed FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), that were initiated nearly 50 years ago, have stimulated a renaissance in the field of radiotherapy, long awaiting a breakthrough modality able to enhance therapeutic responses and limit normal tissue injury. Compared to conventional dose rates used clinically (0.1-0.2 Gy/s), FLASH can implement dose rates of electrons or X-rays in excess of 100 Gy/s. The implications of this ultra-fast delivery of dose are significant and need to be re-evaluated to appreciate the fundamental aspects underlying this seemingly unique radiobiology. The capability of FLASH to significantly spare normal tissue complications in multiple animal models, when compared to conventional rates of dose-delivery, while maintaining persistent growth inhibition of select tumor models has generated considerable excitement, as well as skepticism. Based on fundamental principles of radiation physics, radio-chemistry, and tumor vs. normal cell redox metabolism, this article presents a series of testable, biologically relevant hypotheses, which may help rationalize the differential effects of FLASH irradiation observed between normal tissue and tumors.

PURPOSE: The majority of colorectal cancers are resistant to cancer immune checkpoint inhibitors. Ionizing radiation (IR) and several radiosensitizers, including PARP inhibitors, can enhance responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors by potentially complementary mechanisms of action. We assessed the ability of radiation and PARP inhibition to induce proimmunogenic changes in tumor cells and enhance their in vivo responsiveness to anti-PD-1 antibodies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a candidate drug screen and used flow cytometry to assess effects of the PARP inhibitor veliparib on IR-mediated changes in MHC-1 antigen presentation and surface localization of immune-modulating proteins including PD-L1 and calreticulin in colorectal cancer tumor models. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to assess the effects of veliparib and radiation on the expression of proinflammatory and immunosuppressive cytokines. The ability of concurrent PARP inhibition and subablative doses of radiation therapy to enhance in vivo responsiveness to anti-PD-1 antibodies was assessed using unilateral flank-tumor models with or without T-cell depletion. RESULTS: Veliparib was a potent radiosensitizer in both cell lines. Radiation increased surface localization of MHC-1 and PD-L1 in a dose-dependent manner, and veliparib pretreatment significantly enhanced these effects with high (8 Gy) but not with lower radiation doses. Enhancement of MHC-1 and PD-L1 surface localization by IR and IR+ veliparib remained significant 1, 3, and 7 days after treatment. IR significantly increased delayed tumoral expression of proinflammatory cytokines interferon-Ƴ and CXCL10 but had no significant effect on the expression of IL-6 or TGF-β. Concurrent administration of veliparib and subablative radiation therapy (8 Gy × 2) significantly prolonged anti-PD-1-mediated in vivo tumor growth delay and survival in both tumor models. Moreover, these effects were more pronounced in the microsatellite instability-mutated MC38 tumor model. Enhancement of anti-PD-1 mediated tumor growth delay with veliparib and IR was attenuated by CD8+ T-cell depletion. CONCLUSIONS: We provide preclinical evidence for a novel therapeutic strategy to enhance responsiveness of colorectal tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background

Ultrahigh dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) affords improvements in the therapeutic index by minimizing normal tissue toxicities without compromising antitumor efficacy compared to conventional dose-rate radiotherapy (CONV-RT). To investigate the translational potential of FLASH-RT to a human pediatric medulloblastoma brain tumor, we used a radiosensitive juvenile mouse model to assess adverse long-term neurological outcomes.

Methods

Cohorts of 3-week-old male and female C57Bl/6 mice exposed to hypofractionated (2 × 10 Gy, FLASH-RT or CONV-RT) whole brain irradiation and unirradiated controls underwent behavioral testing to ascertain cognitive status four months posttreatment. Animals were sacrificed 6 months post-irradiation and tissues were analyzed for neurological and cerebrovascular decrements.

Results

The neurological impact of FLASH-RT was analyzed over a 6-month follow-up. FLASH-RT ameliorated neurocognitive decrements induced by CONV-RT and preserved synaptic plasticity and integrity at the electrophysiological (long-term potentiation), molecular (synaptophysin), and structural (Bassoon/Homer-1 bouton) levels in multiple brain regions. The benefits of FLASH-RT were also linked to reduced neuroinflammation (activated microglia) and the preservation of the cerebrovascular structure, by maintaining aquaporin-4 levels and minimizing microglia colocalized to vessels.

Conclusions

Hypofractionated FLASH-RT affords significant and long-term normal tissue protection in the radiosensitive juvenile mouse brain when compared to CONV-RT. The capability of FLASH-RT to preserve critical cognitive outcomes and electrophysiological properties over 6-months is noteworthy and highlights its potential for resolving long-standing complications faced by pediatric brain tumor survivors. While care must be exercised before clinical translation is realized, present findings document the marked benefits of FLASH-RT that extend from synapse to cognition and the microvasculature.