- Roth, Patrick;
- Gorlia, Thierry;
- Reijneveld, Jaap C;
- de Vos, Filip;
- Idbaih, Ahmed;
- Frenel, Jean-Sébastien;
- Le Rhun, Emilie;
- Sepulveda, Juan Manuel;
- Perry, James;
- Masucci, G Laura;
- Freres, Pierre;
- Hirte, Hal;
- Seidel, Clemens;
- Walenkamp, Annemiek;
- Lukacova, Slavka;
- Meijnders, Paul;
- Blais, Andre;
- Ducray, Francois;
- Verschaeve, Vincent;
- Nicholas, Garth;
- Balana, Carmen;
- Bota, Daniela A;
- Preusser, Matthias;
- Nuyens, Sarah;
- Dhermain, Fréderic;
- van den Bent, Martin;
- O’Callaghan, Chris J;
- Vanlancker, Maureen;
- Mason, Warren;
- Weller, Michael
Background
Standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). The proteasome has long been considered a promising therapeutic target because of its role as a central biological hub in tumor cells. Marizomib is a novel pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood-brain barrier.Methods
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 1709/Canadian Cancer Trials Group CE.8 was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label phase 3 superiority trial. Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed glioblastoma, age > 18 years and Karnofsky performance status > 70. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving marizomib in addition to TMZ/RT→TMZ with patients receiving the only standard treatment in the whole population and in the subgroup of patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors.Results
The trial was opened at 82 institutions in Europe, Canada, and the U.S. A total of 749 patients (99.9% of the planned 750) were randomized. OS was not different between the standard and the marizomib arm (median 17 vs. 16.5 months; HR = 1.04; P = .64). PFS was not statistically different either (median 6.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR = 0.97; P = .67). In patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors, OS was also not different between standard therapy and marizomib (median 14.5 vs. 15.1 months, HR = 1.13; P = .27). More CTCAE grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in the marizomib arm than in the standard arm.Conclusions
Adding marizomib to standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy resulted in more toxicity, but did not improve OS or PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.