Background: The population of the U.S. is becoming more diverse every year. The field of dermatology is not following the same trend. Objective: To assess the promotion of diversity in the field of dermatology by analyzing publications focused on diversity, compared to other specialties. Methods: The PubMed database was systematically searched to identify publications focused on diversity from January 2008 to July 2019. The search criteria were as follows: dermatology/radiology/ophthalmology/ anesthesiology/orthopedic surgery/family medicine/ internal medicine/general surgery AND diversity/ diverse/racial/race/ethnic/ethnicity/cultural/culture/competency/competence. Comparisons were made using single-factor ANOVA and two-group t-tests. A qualitative analysis was performed for publications in the field of dermatology. Results: From January 2016 to July 2019, there were 25 publications focused on diversity in dermatology (Mean=6.25, SD=2.06), compared to 6 in radiology (Mean=1.50, SD=1.29, P=0.01), two in ophthalmology (Mean=0.50, SD=0.58, P=0.01), two in anesthesiology (Mean=0.50, SD=1.00, P=0.01), 12 in orthopedic surgery (Mean=3.00, SD=1.41, P=0.04), 23 in family medicine (Mean=5.75, SD=2.22, P=0.75), 9 in internal medicine (Mean=2.25, SD=1.71, P=0.02), and 7 in general surgery (Mean=1.75, SD=0.50, P=0.02). Conclusions: Although the field of dermatology has suffered from a lack of racial/ethnic diversity, efforts to promote diversity via increased publications in the last four years have been stronger in dermatology compared to many other fields.

Background: The prevalence of rosacea in skin of color is not well characterized and may be underestimated. Physicians may not recognize and diagnose rosacea correctly in skin of color.Purpose: To assess the prevalence of rosacea in skin of color and determine if patients of color with rosacea symptoms are receiving a diagnosis of rosaceaMethods: We analyzed the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) for 1993-2010 for racial and ethnic distribution of patients with rosacea. Common reasons for visit in rosacea patients were tabulated and frequency of rosacea diagnosis was compared in patients of each race with the relevant reasons for visit.Results: Of all patients diagnosed with rosacea, 2.0% were black, 2.3% were Asian or Pacific Islander, and 3.9% were Hispanic or Latino of any race. Leading reasons for visit associated with rosacea included “other diseases of the skin”, skin rash, and discoloration or abnormal pigmentation. Rosacea was the primary diagnosis for 8.3% of whites and 2.2% of blacks complaining of “other diseases of the skin”, for 2.0% of whites and 0.6% of blacks complaining of skin rash, and for 3.0% of whites and 0.0% of blacks complaining of discoloration or abnormal pigmentation. The percentage of rosacea patients who were black or Asian/Pacific Islander did not change significantly over time.Limitations: No specific reason-for-visit code indicating rosacea exists in the NAMCS. Prevalence may be underestimated if some patients do not visit a physician for treatment.Conclusions: Patients of color rarely receive a diagnosis of rosacea, even when they have symptoms suggesting it. Rosacea has not become more commonly diagnosed in skin of color in recent years.