Iridium has emerged as the leading catalyst material for the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in acidic media. Often, iridium is mixed with more stable materials such as titanium. For these materials, the electronic structure of titanium plays a crucial role since with varying degrees of oxidation titanium transforms to semiconducting or even insulating phases. Yet, the electronic properties of mixed Ir-TiOx catalysts have never been systematically studied. In this study, we correlate the catalytic performance of mixed Ir-TiOx-based OER catalysts with the electronic structure of the surface layers. For this, a thin film material library with a 20-70 at. % Ir (Ir/[Ir + Ti]) compositional gradient was prepared. We used inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry to test the OER activity and stability of the set of mixed Ir-TiOx catalyst candidate materials. Complementary, Ti L2,3- and O K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy and depth-dependent X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements were performed to correlate the catalytic performance with the composition and electronic property profiles of these mixed Ir-TiOx OER anode catalysts. The spectroscopic analysis reveals that titanium is present as an intermixed matrix of semiconductive but stable TiO2, conductive but less stable titanium-suboxides (TiOx), and highly conductive but highly unstable metallic Ti(0). The extent of the titanium oxidation strongly depends on the titanium content, with a lower degree of oxidation observed for lower titanium (and thus higher iridium) contents. For an iridium loading of 70 at. %, the respective mixed Ir-TiOx catalyst showed a similar OER activity to that of the pure metallic iridium (1.74 vs 1.59 VRHE, respectively) but with a 71% lower iridium dissolution rate relative to the pure metallic iridium. This demonstrates the stabilization effect of titanium addition while maintaining high OER activity.

Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.