Schizophrenia is marked by deficits in facial affect processing associated with abnormalities in GABAergic circuitry, deficits also found in first-degree relatives. Facial affect processing involves a distributed network of brain regions including limbic regions like amygdala and visual processing areas like fusiform cortex. Pharmacological modulation of GABAergic circuitry using benzodiazepines like alprazolam can be useful for studying this facial affect processing network and associated GABAergic abnormalities in schizophrenia. Here, we use pharmacological modulation and computational modeling to study the contribution of GABAergic abnormalities toward emotion processing deficits in schizophrenia. Specifically, we apply principles from network control theory to model persistence energy - the control energy required to maintain brain activation states - during emotion identification and recall tasks, with and without administration of alprazolam, in a sample of first-degree relatives and healthy controls. Here, persistence energy quantifies the magnitude of theoretical external inputs during the task. We find that alprazolam increases persistence energy in relatives but not in controls during threatening face processing, suggesting a compensatory mechanism given the relative absence of behavioral abnormalities in this sample of unaffected relatives. Further, we demonstrate that regions in the fusiform and occipital cortices are important for facilitating state transitions during facial affect processing. Finally, we uncover spatial relationships (i) between regional variation in differential control energy (alprazolam versus placebo) and (ii) both serotonin and dopamine neurotransmitter systems, indicating that alprazolam may exert its effects by altering neuromodulatory systems. Together, these findings provide a new perspective on the distributed emotion processing network and the effect of GABAergic modulation on this network, in addition to identifying an association between schizophrenia risk and abnormal GABAergic effects on persistence energy during threat processing.

OBJECTIVE: Measuring cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) is a promising tool for mapping epileptic networks, but it is not known how variability in brain state and stimulation technique might impact the use of CCEPs for epilepsy localization. We test the hypotheses that (1) CCEPs demonstrate systematic variability across trials and (2) CCEP amplitudes depend on the timing of stimulation with respect to endogenous, low-frequency oscillations. METHODS: We studied 11 patients who underwent CCEP mapping after stereo-electroencephalography electrode implantation for surgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy. Evoked potentials were measured from all electrodes after each pulse of a 30 s, 1 Hz bipolar stimulation train. We quantified monotonic trends, phase dependence, and standard deviation (SD) of N1 (15-50 ms post-stimulation) and N2 (50-300 ms post-stimulation) amplitudes across the 30 stimulation trials for each patient. We used linear regression to quantify the relationship between measures of CCEP variability and the clinical seizure-onset zone (SOZ) or interictal spike rates. RESULTS: We found that N1 and N2 waveforms exhibited both positive and negative monotonic trends in amplitude across trials. SOZ electrodes and electrodes with high interictal spike rates had lower N1 and N2 amplitudes with higher SD across trials. Monotonic trends of N1 and N2 amplitude were more positive when stimulating from an area with higher interictal spike rate. We also found intermittent synchronization of trial-level N1 amplitude with low-frequency phase in the hippocampus, which did not localize the SOZ. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that standard approaches for CCEP mapping, which involve computing a trial-averaged response over a .2-1 Hz stimulation train, may be masking inter-trial variability that localizes to epileptogenic tissue. We also found that CCEP N1 amplitudes synchronize with ongoing low-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus. Further targeted experiments are needed to determine whether phase-locked stimulation could have a role in localizing epileptogenic tissue.

Mindful attention is characterized by acknowledging the present experience as a transient mental event. Early stages of mindfulness practice may require greater neural effort for later efficiency. Early effort may self-regulate behavior and focalize the present, but this understanding lacks a computational explanation. Here we used network control theory as a model of how external control inputs-operationalizing effort-distribute changes in neural activity evoked during mindful attention across the white matter network. We hypothesized that individuals with greater network controllability, thereby efficiently distributing control inputs, effectively self-regulate behavior. We further hypothesized that brain regions that utilize greater control input exhibit shorter intrinsic timescales of neural activity. Shorter timescales characterize quickly discontinuing past processing to focalize the present. We tested these hypotheses in a randomized controlled study that primed participants to either mindfully respond or naturally react to alcohol cues during fMRI and administered text reminders and measurements of alcohol consumption during 4 wk postscan. We found that participants with greater network controllability moderated alcohol consumption. Mindful regulation of alcohol cues, compared to ones own natural reactions, reduced craving, but craving did not differ from the baseline group. Mindful regulation of alcohol cues, compared to the natural reactions of the baseline group, involved more-effortful control of neural dynamics across cognitive control and attention subnetworks. This effort persisted in the natural reactions of the mindful group compared to the baseline group. More-effortful neural states had shorter timescales than less effortful states, offering an explanation for how mindful attention promotes being present.