Background and aims

Colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 50 is recommended for all Americans considered at average risk for the development of colorectal cancer regardless of gender or race/ethnicity. We determined the influence of gender and race/ethnicity on the cost-effectiveness of recommended colorectal cancer screening regimens.

Methods

We determined age-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates; the proportion of left-sided cancers; and the proportion of localized cancers in Asian, black, Latino and white men and women using the California Cancer Registry. We incorporated these data and available data for life expectancy and colorectal cancer survival to model the cost-effectiveness of two 35-year colorectal cancer-screening interventions.

Results

Age-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates were highest in black men and lowest in Latino women. Screening beginning at age 50 was most cost-effective in black men and least cost-effective in Latino women (measured as dollars spent per year of life saved) using annual fecal occult blood testing combined with flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years and using colonoscopy every 10 years. The cost-effectiveness of a 35-year screening program in black men beginning at age 45 was similar to the cost-effectiveness of screening white men and black women beginning at age 50 and more cost-effective than screening nonblack women as well as Asian and Latino men beginning at age 50.

Conclusions

Screening is most cost-effective in black men because of high age-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates. Initiation of colorectal cancer screening in this high-risk group prior to age 50 should be strongly considered.

OBJECTIVE.: To identify patient characteristics which predict receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) versus standard therapy (ST) in metastatic ovarian cancer. METHODS.: A retrospective matched case control study was conducted of 52 women treated with NCT compared to 104 women who received standard treatment from 1996 to 2007. The t test was used for comparison of means between the groups, and the chi(2) test was used for categorical data. Multivariable analysis was performed with logistic regression models and only two-tailed analyses with a P value <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS.: Age, employment and marital status, and insurance alone did not affect treatment allocation (P=NS). However, non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients were more as likely to receive ST (P<0.05). When insurance was stratified by ethnicity, NHW patients were twice as likely to have private insurance (OR=2.29, CI=1.16-4.53). Furthermore, medically compromised (MC) patients who were NHW were almost three times more likely to receive ST (OR=2.72, CI=1.02-5.00). In multivariate analysis, only MC and publically funded women were more likely to receive NCT (OR 3.83 CI=1.35-11.11); P=0.01). During surgery, patients receiving NCT were found to have smaller tumors and less ascites, and were more likely to be optimally debulked with lower estimated blood loss and shorter hospital stays. The median survival for ST was 55.8 months versus 26 months for NCT (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS.: Non-clinical factors such as publically funded status and non-Hispanic White race may influence the allocation of NCT for women with metastatic ovarian cancer.

Objectives

Topotecan improves response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when added to cisplatin in treating metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of adding weekly topotecan to cisplatin in patients with primary, locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix receiving pelvic irradiation.

Methods

Patients with primary, previously untreated, histologically confirmed invasive squamous cell, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix, stages IB2-IVA were treated with external beam pelvic radiotherapy (45 Gy), intracavitary low dose rate brachytherapy (40 Gy) and a parametrial boost (5.4-9 Gy) with overall treatment time not to exceed 8 weeks. Concurrent chemotherapy was IV cisplatin 40 mg/m(2)plus IV topotecan 2 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and once during parametrial boost for 6 cycles. Patients were monitored with history, physical examination, tumor measurement and laboratory evaluation before entering the study, before each cycle of chemotherapy, at study termination and every three months thereafter.

Results

The study met its accrual goal of 12 patients. With a median follow-up of 22 months, eleven patients completed treatment and ten are in long term follow up without evidence of recurrent disease. The 12th patient developed progressive disease during therapy. All patients completed at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy, with the majority (82%) completing 5 or more. Grade 2 or higher neutropenia delayed treatment in 54% of cycles. The median treatment delay was 1.5 cycles (range: 1 to 5 cycles). Median treatment time was 59 days (range 46 to 81 days). The complete RR was 92% (95% confidence interval, 55%-100%).

Conclusions

The addition of weekly topotecan to cisplatin at this dose and schedule during pelvic irradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer appears to be feasible. Based on this primary treatment data and the activity of cisplatin-topotecan in the recurrent disease setting, phase II and III studies of this combination are warranted.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of interstitial brachytherapy in the management of vaginal recurrences of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Thirty patients received interstitial irradiation, with or without external beam radiotherapy. They were followed for a minimum of 5 years or until death. RESULTS: The median age was 66 years at initial diagnosis of endometrial cancer. FIGO stages included Stage I (n = 18), Stage II (n = 7), and Stage III (n = 5). All patients were treated originally by total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with or without lymphadenectomy, and 13 (43%) also received postoperative adjuvant whole pelvis radiotherapy as part of their primary treatment. Vaginal recurrences were diagnosed at a mean interval of 29 months after hysterectomy (range, 3-119 months). No patient had clinical evidence of pelvic sidewall extension or of distant metastatic disease. All patients were treated with interstitial brachytherapy; each implant delivered a mean maximal tumor dose of 25.5 Gy. Eighteen patients (60%) also received external beam radiotherapy (mean dose, 48 Gy) as part of their treatment for vaginal recurrence. Twenty-eight patients (93%) experienced a complete clinical response. Ten patients relapsed in the vagina (n = 5) or at distant sites (n = 5). Eleven patients are dead of disease. From the time of vaginal recurrence, the median overall survival was 60 months and the cause of death adjusted 5-year survival rate was 65%. Major morbidity included radiation proctitis (n = 2), fistula (n = 2), and radiation stricture (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Interstitial irradiation resulted in favorable local control as well as a 5-year survival rate and morbidity comparable to that reported previously for conventional brachytherapy.

Purpose: Women at familial/genetic ovarian cancer risk often undergo screening despite unproven efficacy. Research suggests each woman has her own CA125 baseline; significant increases above this level may identify cancers earlier than standard 6- to 12-monthly CA125 > 35 U/mL.Experimental Design: Data from prospective Cancer Genetics Network and Gynecologic Oncology Group trials, which screened 3,692 women (13,080 woman-screening years) with a strong breast/ovarian cancer family history or BRCA1/2 mutations, were combined to assess a novel screening strategy. Specifically, serum CA125 q3 months, evaluated using a risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA), detected significant increases above each subject's baseline, which triggered transvaginal ultrasound. Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were compared with levels derived from general population screening (specificity 90%, PPV 10%), and stage-at-detection was compared with historical high-risk controls.Results: Specificity for ultrasound referral was 92% versus 90% (P = 0.0001), and PPV was 4.6% versus 10% (P > 0.10). Eighteen of 19 malignant ovarian neoplasms [prevalent = 4, incident = 6, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) = 9] were detected via screening or RRSO. Among incident cases (which best reflect long-term screening performance), three of six invasive cancers were early-stage (I/II; 50% vs. 10% historical BRCA1 controls; P = 0.016). Six of nine RRSO-related cases were stage I. ROCA flagged three of six (50%) incident cases before CA125 exceeded 35 U/mL. Eight of nine patients with stages 0/I/II ovarian cancer were alive at last follow-up (median 6 years).Conclusions: For screened women at familial/genetic ovarian cancer risk, ROCA q3 months had better early-stage sensitivity at high specificity, and low yet possibly acceptable PPV compared with CA125 > 35 U/mL q6/q12 months, warranting further larger cohort evaluation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3628-37. ©2017 AACR.

Because both ovarian and breast cancer are hormone-related and are known to have some predisposition genes in common, we evaluated 11 of the most significant hits (six with confirmed associations with breast cancer) from the breast cancer genome-wide association study for association with invasive ovarian cancer. Eleven SNPs were initially genotyped in 2927 invasive ovarian cancer cases and 4143 controls from six ovarian cancer case-control studies. Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared using a likelihood ratio test in a logistic regression model stratified by study. Initially, three SNPs (rs2107425 in MRPL23, rs7313833 in PTHLH, rs3803662 in TNRC9) were weakly associated with ovarian cancer risk and one SNP (rs4954956 in NXPH2) was associated with serous ovarian cancer in non-Hispanic white subjects (P-trend < 0.1). These four SNPs were then genotyped in an additional 4060 cases and 6308 controls from eight independent studies. Only rs4954956 was significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk both in the replication study and in combined analyses. This association was stronger for the serous histological subtype [per minor allele odds ratio (OR) 1.07 95% CI 1.01-1.13, P-trend = 0.02 for all types of ovarian cancer and OR 1.14 95% CI 1.07-1.22, P-trend = 0.00017 for serous ovarian cancer]. In conclusion, we found that rs4954956 was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, particularly for serous ovarian cancer. However, none of the six confirmed breast cancer susceptibility variants we tested was associated with ovarian cancer risk. Further work will be needed to identify the causal variant associated with rs4954956 or elucidate its function.