Background

Thymidine analog 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) has recently been used for tracking mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In the present study, we tested whether EdU was cytotoxic and whether it interfered with differentiation, cytokine secretion and migration of MSCs.

Methods

EdU labeling was performed by incubating adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) with 10(-8) mol/L of EdU for 48 h. Incorporation of EdU was detected by reaction with azide-conjugated Alexa594. The labeled and unlabeled ADSCs were compared for proliferation and apoptosis as determined by CellTiter and comet assays, respectively. They were also compared for neuron-like and endothelial differentiation as determined by morphology, marker expression and function. Comparison of their secreted cytokine profile was performed by cytokine antibody array. Comparison of their response to homing factor SDF-1 was performed by migration assay.

Results

EdU was incorporated into the nucleus in approximately 70% of ADSCs. No significant differences in proliferation and apoptosis rates were observed between EdU-labeled and unlabeled ADSCs. Isobutylmethylxanthine induced both EdU-labeled and unlabeled ADSCs to assume a neuron-like morphology and to express β-III tubulin. Endothelial growth medium-2 (EGM2) induced endothelial differentiation in both EdU-labeled and unlabeled ADSCs, including the ability to uptake low-density lipoprotein and to form capillary-like structures as well as the expression of vWF, eNOS and CD31. EdU-labeled and unlabeled ADSCs exhibited identical secreted cytokine profile and identical migratory response to SDF-1.

Discussion

At the recommended dosage of 10(-8) mol/L, EdU is non-toxic to ADSCs. EdU label did not interfere with differentiation, cytokine secretion or migratory response to SDF-1 by ADSCs.

Both clinical and preclinical studies have mostly shown beneficial effects for Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. Molecular studies have consistently shown abundant PDE-5 expression in bladder smooth muscle. Data concerning urethral PDE-5 expression have been surprising because striated muscle was not only positively identified, but also found to express more PDE-5 than the smooth muscle. In the prostate, highly variable results have been obtained. For PDE-5 expression, the data have ranged from extremely low to highly abundant. PDE-5 has been found in the glandular epithelium, vascular smooth muscle, endothelium, and fibromuscular stroma.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer is frequently associated with posttreatment erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: To investigate whether injection of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) can ameliorate RT-associated ED. METHODS: Thirty male rats were divided into three groups. The control + phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) group received tail-vein injection of PBS. The radiation + PBS group received radiation over the prostate and tail-vein injection of PBS. The radiation + ADSC group received radiation over the prostate and tail-vein injection of ADSCs, which were labeled with 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU). Seventeen weeks later, erectile function was evaluated by intracavernous pressure (ICP) in response to electrostimulation of cavernous nerves (CNs). Penile tissue and major pelvic ganglia (MPG) were examined by immunofluorescence (IF) and EdU staining. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Erectile function was measured by ICP. Protein expression was examined by IF, followed by image analysis and quantification. RESULTS: Radiation over the prostate caused a significant decrease in erectile function and in the expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in penis and MPG. Cavernous smooth muscle (CSM) but not endothelial content was also reduced. Injection of ADSCs significantly restored erectile function, nNOS expression, and CSM content in the irradiated rats. EdU-positive cells were visible in MPG. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation appears to cause ED via CN injury. ADSC injection can restore erectile function via CN regeneration.

Erectile dysfunction is a multidimensional but common male sexual dysfunction that involves an alteration in any of the components of the erectile response, including organic, relational and psychological. Roles for nonendocrine (neurogenic, vasculogenic and iatrogenic) and endocrine pathways have been proposed. Owing to its strong association with metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease, cardiac assessment may be warranted in men with symptoms of erectile dysfunction. Minimally invasive interventions to relieve the symptoms of erectile dysfunction include lifestyle modifications, oral drugs, injected vasodilator agents and vacuum erection devices. Surgical therapies are reserved for the subset of patients who have contraindications to these nonsurgical interventions, those who experience adverse effects from (or are refractory to) medical therapy and those who also have penile fibrosis or penile vascular insufficiency. Erectile dysfunction can have deleterious effects on a mans quality of life; most patients have symptoms of depression and anxiety related to sexual performance. These symptoms, in turn, affect his partners sexual experience and the couples quality of life. This Primer highlights numerous aspects of erectile dysfunction, summarizes new treatment targets and ongoing preclinical studies that evaluate new pharmacotherapies, and covers the topic of regenerative medicine, which represents the future of sexual medicine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been called into question on the basis of clinical trial data from the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. Comparative analyses of CN for patients treated with immuno-oncology (IO) versus TKI agents are sparse. Our objective was to compare CN timing and outcomes among patients who received TKI versus IO therapy. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CN using data from the REMARCC (Registry of Metastatic RCC) database. The cohort was divided into TKI versus IO first-line therapy groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes included cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors predictive for ACM and CSM. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze 5-yr overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) with stratification by primary systemic therapy and timing in relation to CN. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: We analyzed data for 189 patients (148 TKI + CN, 41 IO +CN; median follow-up 23.2 mo). Multivariable analysis revealed that a greater number of metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; p = 0.015), greater primary tumor size (HR 1.10; p = 0.043), TKI receipt (HR 2.36; p = 0.015), and initiation of systemic therapy after CN (HR 1.49; p = 0.039) were associated with worse ACM. A greater number of metastases at diagnosis (HR 1.07; p = 0.011), greater primary tumor size (HR 1.12; p = 0.018), TKI receipt (HR 5.43; p = 0.004), and initiation of systemic therapy after CN (HR 2.04; p < 0.001) were associated with worse CSM. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed greater 5-yr rates for OS (51% vs 27%; p < 0.001) and CSS (83% vs 30%; p < 0.001) for IO +CN versus TKI + CN. This difference persisted in a subgroup analysis for patients with intermediate or poor risk, with 5-yr OS rates of 50% for IO + CN versus 30% for TKI + CN (p < 0.001). A subanalysis stratified by CN timing revealed better 5-yr rates for OS (50% vs 30%; p = 0.042) and CSS (90% vs 30%, p = 0.019) for delayed CN after IO therapy, but not after TKI therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: For patients who underwent CN, systemic therapy before CN was associated with better outcomes. In addition, IO therapy was associated with better survival outcomes in comparison to TKI therapy. Our findings question the applicability of clinical trial data from the TKI era to CN in the IO era for mRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: For patients with metastatic kidney cancer treated with surgery, better survival outcomes were observed for those who also received immunotherapy in comparison to therapy targeting specific proteins in the body (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs). Immunotherapy or TKI treatment resulted in better outcomes if it was received before rather than after surgery.