Clinical benefit of immune checkpoint blockade in glioblastoma (GBM) is rare, and we hypothesize that tumor clonal evolution and the immune microenvironment are key determinants of response. Here, we present a detailed molecular characterization of the intratumoral and immune heterogeneity in an IDH wild-type, MGMT-negative GBM patient who plausibly benefited from anti-PD-1 therapy with an unusually long 25-mo overall survival time. We leveraged multiplex immunohistochemistry, RNA-seq, and whole-exome data from the primary tumor and three resected regions of recurrent disease to survey regional tumor-immune interactions, genomic instability, mutation burden, and expression profiles. We found significant regional heterogeneity in the neoantigenic and immune landscape, with a differential T-cell signature among recurrent sectors, a uniform loss of focal amplifications in EGFR, and a novel subclonal EGFR mutation. Comparisons with recently reported correlates of checkpoint blockade in GBM and with TCGA-GBM revealed appreciable intratumoral heterogeneity that may have contributed to a differential PD-1 blockade response.

Purpose

The Cancer Immune Monitoring and Analysis Centers - Cancer Immunologic Data Commons (CIMAC-CIDC) network supported by the NCI Cancer Moonshot initiative was established to provide correlative analyses for clinical trials in cancer immunotherapy, using state-of-the-art technology. Fundamental to this initiative is implementation of multiplex IHC assays to define the composition and distribution of immune infiltrates within tumors in the context of their potential role as biomarkers. A critical unanswered question involves the relative fidelity of such assays to reliably quantify tumor-associated immune cells across different platforms.

Experimental design

Three CIMAC sites compared across their laboratories: (i) image analysis algorithms, (ii) image acquisition platforms, (iii) multiplex staining protocols. Two distinct high-dimensional approaches were employed: multiplexed IHC consecutive staining on single slide (MICSSS) and multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF). To eliminate variables potentially impacting assay performance, we completed a multistep harmonization process, first comparing assay performance using independent protocols followed by the integration of laboratory-specific protocols and finally, validating this harmonized approach in an independent set of tissues.

Results

Data generated at the final validation step showed an intersite Spearman correlation coefficient (r) of ≥0.85 for each marker within and across tissue types, with an overall low average coefficient of variation ≤0.1.

Conclusions

Our results support interchangeability of protocols and platforms to deliver robust, and comparable data using similar tissue specimens and confirm that CIMAC-CIDC analyses may therefore be used with confidence for statistical associations with clinical outcomes largely independent of site, antibody selection, protocol, and platform across different sites.