Departmental Working Papers

Parent: Department of Economics

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for November, 2024 through February, 2025

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
76h442pgDifferences in Impact Factor Across Fields and Over Time3,57273,5650.2%
3fc7n20bDoes Single Parenthood Increase the Probability of Teenage Promiscuity, Drug Use, and Crime? Evidence from Divorce Law Changes21372063.3%
11s61814The Origin of the Bank of England: A Credible Commitment to Sovereign Debt18131781.7%
07k895v4The Own and Social Effects of an Unexpected Income Shock: Evidence from the Dutch Postcode Lottery1722414814.0%
1zd0q0vnLEISURE COLLEGE, USA13861324.3%
5b17d1drTHE LAW OF ONE PRICE, BORDERS AND PURCHASING POWER PARITY13641322.9%
9h54w76cDictatorship, Democracy, and the Provision of Public Goods1343210223.9%
2n8899rpTHE LAW OF ONE PRICE, PURCHASING POWER PARITY AND EXCHANGE RATES: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT11271056.3%
0w64d54dAnatomy of a Slow-Motion Health Insurance Death Spiral111149712.6%
50q3c9n1Leadership Skills and Wages102782476.5%
0dc3k4m5UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL PREFERENCES WITH SIMPLE TESTS100584258.0%
0127h86vPromises & Partnership989899.2%
6m0584qvExperimental Games on Networks: Underpinnings of Behavior andEquilibrium Selection927857.6%
57q360q6What’s in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games91325935.2%
0hx9x4jrThe McDonald's Equilibrium: Advertising, Empty Calories, and the Endogenous Determination of Dietary Preferences86434350.0%
9wp245m2Living Supply and Demand Curves71195226.8%
60z886n7The Modern Theory of the LOP and PPP: Some Implications68105814.7%
68g1n1v8Political Economy and Natural Resource Use68313745.6%
9cm846c4Endogenous Transfers in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game: An Experimental Test Of Cooperation And Coordination66115516.7%
7320x2cpSelf-Signaling Versus Social-Signaling in Giving64154923.4%
7g63k28wWhen Optimal Choices Feel Wrong: A Laboratory Study of Bayesian Updating, Complexity, and Affect60223836.7%
8rp6b18cATTRIBUTION AND RECIPROCITY IN AN EXPERIMENTAL LABOR MARKET60154525.0%
3268z4rxDo Lax Environmental Regulations Attract Foreign Investment?59184130.5%
27t4q265Arbitrage and the Law of One Price: Setting the Record Straight553525.5%
5512d150Comprehension and Risk Elicitation in the Field: Evidence from Rural Senegal55124321.8%
60b93868Strategic Ignorance and the Robustness of Social Preferences55223340.0%
6nf9t426Sex and Fiscal Desire5584714.5%
7vq8v499ECONOMIC RATIONALITY AND THE AREEDA-TURNER RULE54361866.7%
8g88c6wwThe Origin of the Winner’s Curse: A Laboratory Study52341865.4%
1vr4g446The Dark Side of Competition for Status50252550.0%
69c4x8m9Bayesian Heteroskedasticity-Robust Standard Errors5074314.0%
428481s8Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Investment47192840.4%
13r2f3gtAn Unlucky Feeling: Overconfidence and Noisy Feedback46212545.7%
4823c3jxReal Costs of Nominal Grade Inflation? New Evidence from Student Course Evaluations46192741.3%
7s72r56pBehavior in Second-Price Auctions by Highly Experienced eBay Buyers and Sellers45103522.2%
8d5824r7The Return to Capital and the Business Cycle45331273.3%
7kz6v3zsThe Economic Consequences of Rising U.S. Government Debt: Privileges at Risk43222151.2%
78s8m9rnBid and Guess: A Nested Mechanism for King Solomon's Dilemma4273516.7%
6836m74qBroken Promises: An Experiment41202148.8%
6ks5p6v5The Equity Premium: A Deeper Puzzle41113026.8%
3tc3j5x7Incentives to Exercise40112927.5%
48m9547qLet me, or Let George? Motives of competing altruists4083220.0%
0vf2k2p0Looking under the COUNTER for overcounted downloads39132633.3%
22w466q9Stem Cell Donor Matching for Patients of Mixed Race3963315.4%
3858888wThe Dark Side of Competition for Status39102925.6%
6gm8164wDoes the Environmental Kuznets Curve Describe How Individual Countries Behave?39112828.2%
0m6035wgThe Intraday Liquidity Management Game38251365.8%
4vs7h4hhWHEN ARE LAYOFFS ACCEPTABLE? EVIDENCE FROM A QUASI-EXPERIMENT37102727.0%
6j47s8kqThe Australian Private Health Insurance Boom: Was It Subsidies Or Liberalised?3753213.5%
93n646dbLetting Down the Team? Social Effects of Team Incentives37112629.7%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.