Open Access Policy Deposits

Parent: Department of Linguistics

eScholarship stats: History by Item for December, 2024 through March, 2025

ItemTitleTotal requests2025-032025-022025-012024-12
05b2s4wgThe empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology16549483830
7f26m713Challenges for a theory of islands: A broader perspective on Ambridge, Pine, and Lieven14215483445
04r5q6qnWPP, No. 105: Linguistic Voice Quality9016272126
9xx930j1WPP, No. 108: Phonation Contrasts Across Languages719162125
9pn2b9qmMeasures of the glottal source spectrum.6614231415
0n76t3hnWPP, No.111: Glottal articulations of phonation contrasts and their acoustic and perceptual consequences6413201714
1xn120qkWhen is a Verb not a Verb?5512211012
8dr06327Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice5013131212
29s5h9w3Information conveyed by voice qualitya)478171012
4mt0s60wMeasuring vocal quality with speech synthesis.46111898
90d6532fWPP, No. 104: Intonational Phonology of Seoul Korean Revisited4611101015
92d624qq“Narten formations” versus “Narten roots”46920116
60v8v517Dependent-case assignment could be AGREE45131589
88x529wrA comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010451211148
1gs6h5k7WPP, No. 108: The acoustic consequences of phonation and tone interactions in Jalapa Mazatec411212611
52g5f2dqMore on (the Lack of) Reconstruction in English Tough-Constructions41121667
7x39t5hgThree levels of the symbolosphere401312312
61f416jpfMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension39131169
0xd5n4gkHigh-toned [il] in Korean: Phonetics, intonational phonology, and sound change38411149
2mw9c40qNon-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and theory of mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach.37171244
3fq7x9mbVocal fold vibratory patterns in tense versus lax phonation contrasts37718102
4qs31528WPP, No. 108: Perception of pitch location within a speaker’s own range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex37712108
5dp6b6s4Not all reconstruction effects are syntactic37151372
9w85x4mcValidity of rating scale measures of voice quality.3771479
0n100842Grammar and the use of data361014102
46v4j8dtProbabilistic atlas for the language network based on precision fMRI data from >800 individuals3621492
9n26b70jInformation Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist36912105
3987s5jjDifferential Tracking of Linguistic vs. Mental State Content in Naturalistic Stimuli by Language and Theory of Mind (ToM) Brain Networks.34151153
5tj8f292Against some approaches to long-distance agreement without AGREE34610108
9mt1x9z7A meta-analytic review of morphological priming in Semitic languages349799
8k4092h0Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.3351477
0hc673msSynchronic and diachronic microvariation in English do318977
69r4g5xdParameterizing passive participle movement3141476
8r206459Toward a unified theory of voice production and perception3149810
0h9362zfValidating a psychoacoustic model of voice quality.30101046
75z0w33wWhy do children pay more attention to grammatical morphemes at the ends of sentences?30410412
7h89m6pnEighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies307878
0r69t4trWPP, No. 103: Linguistic Phonetics in the UCLA Phonetics Lab2911945
4kz9d7v0No evidence for differences among language regions in their temporal receptive windows2961274
50d070bwDegree modification in natural language2766510
6mt3d01xSemantic projection recovers rich human knowledge of multiple object features from word embeddings.2710125
82m3995fThe perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality.2731068
5bc7k7xdWPP, No.110: Perception of spectral slopes and tone identification in White Hmong266686
6tg5z1jkThe polysemy of measurement2631427
98j5s1r7Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in “let alone” ellipsis2651164
1640t82jVocal Fundamental Frequency and Sound Pressure Level in Charismatic Speech: A Cross-Gender and -Language Study.2561063
3hq140vhAcoustic voice variation within and between speakers.2510654
8rv9t589WPP, No. 106: Effects of Initial Position versus Prominence in English257783
1gh6x943WPP, No. 108: Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin2421066
8b12461jWPP, No. 103: Speech Perception in Dyslexic Children With and Without Language Impairments2473410

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.