Open Access Policy Deposits

Parent: Department of Linguistics

eScholarship stats: History by Item for September through December, 2024

ItemTitleTotal requests2024-122024-112024-102024-09
7f26m713Challenges for a theory of islands: A broader perspective on Ambridge, Pine, and Lieven9945142119
04r5q6qnWPP, No. 105: Linguistic Voice Quality822623258
9pn2b9qmMeasures of the glottal source spectrum.6115161911
9xx930j1WPP, No. 108: Phonation Contrasts Across Languages54257139
05b2s4wgThe empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology52306124
0n76t3hnWPP, No.111: Glottal articulations of phonation contrasts and their acoustic and perceptual consequences511472010
8vk1j9n6WPP, No. 106: Intonational Phonology of Georgian5151423
1xn120qkWhen is a Verb not a Verb?441211138
90d6532fWPP, No. 104: Intonational Phonology of Seoul Korean Revisited44151379
0xd5n4gkHigh-toned [il] in Korean: Phonetics, intonational phonology, and sound change39912810
4qs31528WPP, No. 108: Perception of pitch location within a speaker’s own range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex3688164
60v8v517Dependent-case assignment could be AGREE3697119
92d624qq“Narten formations” versus “Narten roots”3669174
29s5h9w3Information conveyed by voice qualitya)3112874
50d070bwDegree modification in natural language31107113
82m3995fThe perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality.3183146
0hc673msSynchronic and diachronic microvariation in English do307887
75z0w33wWhy do children pay more attention to grammatical morphemes at the ends of sentences?30121152
7x39t5hgThree levels of the symbolosphere3012585
1gs6h5k7WPP, No. 108: The acoustic consequences of phonation and tone interactions in Jalapa Mazatec2911495
5tj8f292Against some approaches to long-distance agreement without AGREE2986510
85z926p7WPP, No. 104: Prosody in Sentence Processing: Korean vs. English2810783
88x529wrA comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010288794
1dq08371Subject Case in Children With SLI and Unaffected Controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns Omission Model2721096
1gh6x943WPP, No. 108: Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin276597
6tg5z1jkThe polysemy of measurement2771127
8r206459Toward a unified theory of voice production and perception2710584
8dr06327Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice2612266
9mt1x9z7A meta-analytic review of morphological priming in Semitic languages2693113
9w85x4mcValidity of rating scale measures of voice quality.269575
3xk61586Cue-shifting between acoustic cues: Evidence for directional asymmetry2551910
0h9362zfValidating a psychoacoustic model of voice quality.246765
4mt0s60wMeasuring vocal quality with speech synthesis.238357
8k4092h0Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.2372113
61f416jpfMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension229472
8b12461jWPP, No. 103: Speech Perception in Dyslexic Children With and Without Language Impairments2210543
2bx789pqA Multilab Study of Bilingual Infants: Exploring the Preference for Infant-Directed Speech214494
74z3z4c3Stem similarity modulates infants' acquisition of phonological alternations216573
1v3459mcMeasure Phrase Equatives and Modified Numerals20848
4kz9d7v0No evidence for differences among language regions in their temporal receptive windows194285
8hb954bqSerbo-Croatian clitic placement: An argument for prosodic movement192674
0n100842Grammar and the use of data182565
0r69t4trWPP, No. 103: Linguistic Phonetics in the UCLA Phonetics Lab185544
3fq7x9mbVocal fold vibratory patterns in tense versus lax phonation contrasts182277
52g5f2dqMore on (the Lack of) Reconstruction in English Tough-Constructions18783
5bc7k7xdWPP, No.110: Perception of spectral slopes and tone identification in White Hmong186282
65v911tqImproper case18468
6608d4ftIntervention in tough-constructions revisited184374
7h89m6pnEighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies.188451
1qm548f8Exposure to a second language in infancy alters speech production179521

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.