Center for the Study of Energy Markets
Parent: University of California Energy Institute
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for December, 2024 through March, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 361 | 32 | 329 | 8.9% |
| 11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 262 | 71 | 191 | 27.1% |
| 4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 163 | 15 | 148 | 9.2% |
| 4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 135 | 30 | 105 | 22.2% |
| 3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 125 | 18 | 107 | 14.4% |
| 3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 102 | 17 | 85 | 16.7% |
| 86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 91 | 5 | 86 | 5.5% |
| 2dk5g982 | The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Profits and Random Fluctuations in Weather | 85 | 7 | 78 | 8.2% |
| 74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 74 | 6 | 68 | 8.1% |
| 7vq1m8mq | Market Power in California's Gasoline Market | 69 | 6 | 63 | 8.7% |
| 3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 65 | 18 | 47 | 27.7% |
| 2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 63 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% |
| 9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 59 | 10 | 49 | 16.9% |
| 9241c68t | Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation | 53 | 13 | 40 | 24.5% |
| 8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 50 | 13 | 37 | 26.0% |
| 27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 49 | 22 | 27 | 44.9% |
| 0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 48 | 5 | 43 | 10.4% |
| 6dw241sv | Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market 1998 - 2000 | 47 | 8 | 39 | 17.0% |
| 34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 46 | 6 | 40 | 13.0% |
| 09v4k44b | Towards a Sustainable Energy Balance: Progressive Efficiency and the Return of Energy Conservation | 43 | 6 | 37 | 14.0% |
| 3qb650hh | Do Households Smooth Small Consumption Shocks? Evidence from Anticipated and Unanticipated Variation in Home Energy Costs | 40 | 9 | 31 | 22.5% |
| 6br429mf | Using Environmental Emissions Permit Prices to Raise Electricity Prices: Evidence from the California Electricity Market | 38 | 6 | 32 | 15.8% |
| 0v38t8r8 | Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells | 35 | 3 | 32 | 8.6% |
| 2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 35 | 5 | 30 | 14.3% |
| 9s75171w | California's Electricity Crisis: A Market Apart? | 35 | 9 | 26 | 25.7% |
| 2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 34 | 2 | 32 | 5.9% |
| 7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 33 | 10 | 23 | 30.3% |
| 53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 32 | 4 | 28 | 12.5% |
| 6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 31 | 17 | 14 | 54.8% |
| 0h90r7k2 | Building Out Alternative Fuel Retail Infrastructure: Government Fleet Spillovers in E85 | 29 | 14 | 15 | 48.3% |
| 5dt476pc | Lessons from the California Electricity Crisis | 29 | 4 | 25 | 13.8% |
| 7p0168sp | What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx Trading Program | 29 | 7 | 22 | 24.1% |
| 6qr7m8kh | Market Effects of Environmental Regulation: Coal, Railroads and the 1990 Clean Air Act | 28 | 9 | 19 | 32.1% |
| 3dh7v8bq | The Impact of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 on Electric Utilities and Coal Mines: Evidence from the Stock Market | 27 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% |
| 85k8w3k7 | The History of Electricity Restructuring in California | 27 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% |
| 2c96w6ff | From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer | 26 | 7 | 19 | 26.9% |
| 5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 26 | 8 | 18 | 30.8% |
| 9xz9r2gm | The Implications of a Gasoline Price Floor for the California Budget and Greenhouse Gas Emissions | 26 | 4 | 22 | 15.4% |
| 4bx684r8 | Designing Electricity Auctions | 25 | 10 | 15 | 40.0% |
| 54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 25 | 5 | 20 | 20.0% |
| 0128s4r3 | Lessons from International Experience with Electricity Market Monitoring | 24 | 6 | 18 | 25.0% |
| 3g9504bb | The Implied Cost of Carbon Dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers Program | 24 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% |
| 4dd7f3mq | Capacity Markets for Electricity | 24 | 6 | 18 | 25.0% |
| 4vd3k3jt | The Length of Contracts and Collusion | 24 | 7 | 17 | 29.2% |
| 8qx3z0x7 | Variation of Distribution Factors with Loading | 24 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 1hj0983z | Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency Revisited | 23 | 2 | 21 | 8.7% |
| 1nn681tk | Climate Change, Mortality, and Adaptation: Evidence from Annual Fluctuations in Weather in the US | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% |
| 8b2106nz | Wealth Transfers Among Large Customers from Implementing Real-Time Retail Electricity Pricing | 22 | 5 | 17 | 22.7% |
| 52f998s0 | Applying Psychology to Economic Policy Design: Using Incentive Preserving Rebates to Increase Acceptance of Critical Peak Electricity Pricing | 21 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% |
| 6b9204pn | Biases in Static Oligopoly Models?: Evidence from the California Electricity Market | 21 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.