Department of Philosophy
Parent: UC Berkeley
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for September through December, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2vp2x4rx | A Semantic Hierarchy for Intuitionistic Logic | 151 | 25 | 126 | 16.6% |
| 9ts1b228 | Possibility Semantics | 132 | 31 | 101 | 23.5% |
| 9hd0g86c | Arrow's Decisive Coalitions | 81 | 15 | 66 | 18.5% |
| 7kr412rz | Trust, anger, resentment, forgiveness: On blame and its reasons | 78 | 24 | 54 | 30.8% |
| 6xq0f176 | Reply | 72 | 1 | 71 | 1.4% |
| 2nn3c35x | The Logic of Comparative Cardinality | 70 | 28 | 42 | 40.0% |
| 4f11t8k3 | School in the time of Covid | 67 | 2 | 65 | 3.0% |
| 1m3156ps | Logics of Imprecise Comparative Probability | 66 | 21 | 45 | 31.8% |
| 27k2f44p | Another Problem in Possible World Semantics | 63 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% |
| 5039n29t | A partial-state space model of unawareness | 60 | 15 | 45 | 25.0% |
| 82w2d085 | Simplifying the Surprise Exam | 59 | 13 | 46 | 22.0% |
| 2g73d7qv | Voting Theory in the Lean Theorem Prover | 48 | 6 | 42 | 12.5% |
| 6w21t4jn | Inquisitive Intuitionistic Logic | 48 | 11 | 37 | 22.9% |
| 69f4t1wg | Algebraic and topological semantics for inquisitive logic via choice-free duality | 47 | 10 | 37 | 21.3% |
| 0379725f | On the Modal Logic of Subset and Superset: Tense Logic over Medvedev Frames | 43 | 21 | 22 | 48.8% |
| 5jw0p2mz | Axiomatization in the Meaning Sciences | 41 | 12 | 29 | 29.3% |
| 4w2083v3 | Three roads to complete lattices: orders, compatibility, polarity | 38 | 6 | 32 | 15.8% |
| 46r5502v | A note on Murakami’s theorems and incomplete social choice without the Pareto principle | 37 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% |
| 303338xr | A Note on Algebraic Semantics for S5 with Propositional Quantifiers | 36 | 15 | 21 | 41.7% |
| 46w023hs | One Modal Logic to Rule Them All? | 36 | 14 | 22 | 38.9% |
| 37z3r3t4 | Split Cycle: A New Condorcet Consistent Voting Method Independent of Clones and Immune to Spoilers | 35 | 7 | 28 | 20.0% |
| 40c139d1 | Preferential Structures for Comparative Probabilistic Reasoning | 35 | 2 | 33 | 5.7% |
| 00p6t2v4 | Choice-free Stone duality | 34 | 5 | 29 | 14.7% |
| 57q7t509 | Compatibility, compossibility, and epistemic modality | 33 | 7 | 26 | 21.2% |
| 0ss5z8g3 | The Orthologic of Epistemic Modals | 29 | 6 | 23 | 20.7% |
| 11c0x4n5 | Figure and Ground in Logical Space | 29 | 5 | 24 | 17.2% |
| 2s0134zx | Locales, Nuclei, and Dragalin Frames | 29 | 7 | 22 | 24.1% |
| 8br2b074 | Inferring Probability Comparisons | 28 | 9 | 19 | 32.1% |
| 2152w8k6 | Epistemic Closure and Epistemic Logic I: Relevant Alternatives and Subjunctivism | 27 | 6 | 21 | 22.2% |
| 07v9360j | One Modal Logic to Rule Them All? (Extended Technical Report) | 26 | 5 | 21 | 19.2% |
| 91f717px | Fallibilism and Multiple Paths to Knowledge (Extended Version) | 25 | 9 | 16 | 36.0% |
| 9pm9t4vp | Partiality and Adjointness in Modal Logic | 25 | 1 | 24 | 4.0% |
| 9v11r0dq | Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic (June 2016) | 24 | 5 | 19 | 20.8% |
| 2h5069pq | A Bimodal Perspective on Possibility Semantics | 23 | 11 | 12 | 47.8% |
| 2sf7x271 | A note on cancellation axioms for comparative probability | 23 | 6 | 17 | 26.1% |
| 8bp759nc | A fundamental non-classical logic | 23 | 4 | 19 | 17.4% |
| 5462j5b6 | Possibility Frames and Forcing for Modal Logic | 22 | 5 | 17 | 22.7% |
| 01p9x1hv | Complete Additivity and Modal Incompleteness | 21 | 2 | 19 | 9.5% |
| 7gr812wb | I—Vagueness as Indecision | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% |
| 8pp4d94t | Complete Additivity and Modal Incompleteness | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% |
| 4z83s9z9 | Compatibility and accessibility: lattice representations for semantics of non-classical and modal logics | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% |
| 64k4m60p | On Probabilistic Knowledge | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% |
| 4rc8v84j | Replies to Raffman, Stanley, and Wright | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% |
| 1365c3jb | Measure semantics and qualitative semantics for epistemic modals | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% |
| 1722x1tx | Précis of The View from Here | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% |
| 7sc8x8c4 | Indicative Conditionals and Dynamic Epistemic Logic | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% |
| 4wh0c3br | Replies to Symposiasts on The View from Here | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.