Works 2000 to Present
Parent: University of California Systemwide Libraries
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for September through December, 2024
Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4b81g01z | Guidelines for Efficient Archival Processing in the University of California Libraries (Version 4) | 771 | 131 | 640 | 17.0% |
8cn0q1nw | Negotiating with scholarly journal publishers: A toolkit from the University of California | 770 | 25 | 745 | 3.2% |
4mq1461d | Statement on Inclusion and Equity in Special Collections, Archives, and Distinctive Collections in the University of California Libraries | 590 | 15 | 575 | 2.5% |
9cg222jc | UC Guidelines for Born-Digital Archival Description | 360 | 64 | 296 | 17.8% |
5gc4r5mg | Pathways to Open Access | 117 | 18 | 99 | 15.4% |
8326n305 | Pay It Forward: Investigating a Sustainable Model of Open Access Article Processing Charges for Large North American Research Institutions [Final Report] | 109 | 11 | 98 | 10.1% |
1sw157j3 | Guidelines for Efficient Archival Processing in the University of California Libraries (Version 3.2) | 107 | 10 | 97 | 9.3% |
9190j56c | Forum Planning Committee’s Report to UC Council of University Librarians on Choosing Pathways to Open Access (CP2OA) | 100 | 6 | 94 | 6.0% |
2rq679qx | University of California Libraries Digital Reformatting Guidelines | 91 | 20 | 71 | 22.0% |
5174k245 | The UC Libraries: collaborating for mission, leadership and efficiency | 62 | 8 | 54 | 12.9% |
3kq6h67m | University of California Digital Preservation Strategy Working Group: Phase Two Report | 45 | 2 | 43 | 4.4% |
2xh8868j | Alma Annual Statistics Analytics Project Team May 2023 Report: Recommendations for standardizing, harmonizing and centralizing the UC Libraries / UC Office of the President Annual Statistics | 39 | 3 | 36 | 7.7% |
58n4727v | Holistic Decision-Making Frameworks: Accountability, Transparency, and Communication | 33 | 3 | 30 | 9.1% |
80v318pm | UC Digital Preservation Strategy Working Group: Phase One Report | 28 | 9 | 19 | 32.1% |
4318k90h | The University of California Library Collection: Content for the 21st Century and Beyond | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% |
74j5z0pd | Systemwide Library and Scholarly Information Advisory Committee Library Planning Task Force Final Report | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% |
1sz1f058 | Next-Generation Technical Services (NGTS): New Modes for Organizing and Providing Access to Special Collections, Archive, and Digital Formats: Final Report | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% |
2h36d04f | Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California | 13 | 4 | 9 | 30.8% |
18g4c325 | Collection Management Strategies in a Digital Environment. A Project of the Collection Management Initiative of the University of California Libraries. Final Report to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% |
9f55z232 | Update on open access and academic journal contracts: Presentation to the Board of Regents' Academic and Student Affairs Committee | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% |
2321523v | Systemwide Strategic Directions for Libraries and Scholarly Information at the University of California | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% |
40p7d0tj | UC WEST Coordinating Committee Final Report | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% |
839107nt | Systemwide Strategic Directions for Libraries and Scholarly Information at the University of California: Progress Report 2005 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% |
1r803879 | A Funding Model and Decision Process Plan for Selective Co‐Investment Opportunities in the UC Libraries: Initiatives, Projects, Agreements, Memberships, etc. | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% |
20b3b4bd | NGTS (Next Generation Technical Services) Management Team Final Report | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% |
6p4124rt | UC Digital Collection Development Strategy | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% |
23j8r6sh | Developing a "Copy of Record": Archiving Pilot Project for the University of California. Report of the Task Force on Collaborative Strategies for Archiving of Print in the Digital Environment (PAG) | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.