Working Papers
Parent: Linguistics Research Center
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for September through December, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6sm3953w | Turkish Emphatic Reduplication | 120 | 5 | 115 | 4.2% |
| 90j0v6q7 | Syntax & Semantics at Santa Cruz, Volume III | 96 | 50 | 46 | 52.1% |
| 1sg6s8pf | Syntax & Semantics at Santa Cruz, Volume II | 51 | 16 | 35 | 31.4% |
| 7f21f6d0 | Cleaning Up the Scraps: A New Look at Kwak'wala m'u:t Reduplication | 50 | 20 | 30 | 40.0% |
| 0765s94q | Nonconcatenative Morphology in Coptic | 48 | 31 | 17 | 64.6% |
| 0bg941n7 | Syntax & Semantics at Santa Cruz, Volume IV | 48 | 26 | 22 | 54.2% |
| 7n39q0g3 | True Output Theory: The Phonetics and Phonology of Low Vowel Lengthening in Hungarian | 48 | 21 | 27 | 43.8% |
| 2s3545j1 | Syntax & Semantics at Santa Cruz, Volume V | 41 | 5 | 36 | 12.2% |
| 6nz046br | Catalan Cluster Simplification and Nasal Place Assimilation | 36 | 15 | 21 | 41.7% |
| 3sr39341 | The Syllable as Contour Tone Host | 35 | 22 | 13 | 62.9% |
| 8fk5q4ms | Syntax & Semantics at Santa Cruz, Volume I | 33 | 13 | 20 | 39.4% |
| 1kp8x9hf | Infixal Nominal Reduplication in Mangarayi | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20.0% |
| 4ch689cf | Why Syllable Weight Seems to Work Differently at the Right Edge, and Why It Really Works the Same | 28 | 21 | 7 | 75.0% |
| 8t55c200 | Lexical Classes in Japanese: A reply to Rice | 27 | 8 | 19 | 29.6% |
| 2dv4h9tq | Syllabification in Khalka Mongolian and Output-Output Correspondence | 26 | 8 | 18 | 30.8% |
| 9342n2v6 | Intra-Paradigmatic Contrast in Arabic Verbal Morphology | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% |
| 6147d5hv | Contrast, Comparison Sets, and the Perceptual Space | 15 | 7 | 8 | 46.7% |
| 9034q204 | Head Dominance in Modern Hebrew Prosodic Morphology | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% |
| 52s6w4wz | If *NT and *ND Got in a Fight, Who Would Win? Ranking Paradoxes and English Postnasal Stop Deletion | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.