Journal of Writing Assessment

eScholarship stats: History by Item for October, 2024 through January, 2025

Item	Title	Total requests	2025-01	2024-12	2024-11	2024-10
0934x4rm	Neurodivergence and Intersectionality in Labor-Based Grading Contracts	370	107	78	91	94
0j28w67h	A Legacy of Grading Contracts for Composition	354	75	85	91	103
1b90q8rd	Comments on Student Papers: Student Perspectives	257	50	24	94	89
1p60j218	Enabling Meaningful Labor: Narratives of Participation in a Grading Contract	240	55	57	52	76
7qh108bw	Critique of Mark D. Shermis & Ben Hamner, 'Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis'	238	53	80	47	58
3gm126sq	Construct Validity and the Demise of the Analytical Writing Placement Examination (AWPE) at the University of California: A Tale of Social Mobility	224	122	102
36t565mm	A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment	207	36	52	51	68
6vn170k5	The Strange Loop of Self-Efficacy and the Value of Focus Groups in Writing Program Assessment	187	77	110
9175z7zs	Write Outside the Boxes: The Single Point Rubric in the Secondary ELA Classroom	186	41	35	55	55
263565cq	The BABEL Generator and E-Rater: 21st Century Writing Constructs and Automated Essay Scoring (AES)	185	49	41	59	36
52k3376g	Assessment is Constructed and Contextual: Identity, Information Literacy, and Interview-Based Methodologies in the First-Year Writing Classroom	185	96	89
4bg9003k	An Integrated Design and Appraisal Framework for Ethical Writing Assessment	182	44	49	34	55
03g148gh	Reliability of National Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum Assessment System	179	44	41	47	47
5dp4m86t	The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writerly Self-Efficacy in Writing Centers	173	46	36	38	53
2c4979b8	Contract Grading and the Development of an Efficacious Writerly Habitus	171	37	30	65	39
9hn4297f	Editor’s Introduction: The “Accidental California Issue” – Critical Questions about Fairness and Equity in Writing Assessment and Placement	167	70	97
7mp54031	Editor’s Introduction: Special Issue on Student Self Placement (SSP)	166	25	39	54	48
06n1v820	Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation	165	36	43	32	54
4b85378n	Collaborative Writing Placement: Partnering with Students in the Placement Process	165	69	96
7v9830xh	Placement is Everyone’s Business: A Love Letter to Our SSP Coalition	159	24	37	49	49
5f79g6kz	College Students' Use of a Writing Rubric: Effect on Quality of Writing, Self-Efficacy, and Writing Practices	154	38	33	41	42
70g147sg	Achieving High Goals: The Impact of Contract Grading on High School Students' Academic Performance, Avoidance Orientation, and Social Comparison	154	30	34	49	41
5vq519dr	Globalizing Plagiarism & Writing Assessment: A Case Study of Turnitin	153	29	45	45	34
3wz6s1qb	Directed Self-Placement for Multilingual, Multicultural International Students	139	27	38	36	38
6w87j2wp	Reframing Reliability for Writing Assessment	139	26	34	33	46
0xh7v6fb	Decolonizing Validity	137	32	35	33	37
1bn464xs	Testing the Tests, a review of George Hillocks: The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning	137	29	40	34	34
4v65z263	Building Student Agency Through Contract Grading in Technical Communication	135	37	27	30	41
07c5j8tp	Self-Characterization in the Self-Placement Assessment Ecology: Complicating the Stories We Tell about DSP’s Effects and Effectiveness	134	22	38	35	39
02q4g1gt	Contract Grading in a Technical Writing Classroom: A Case Study	131	15	32	46	38
7gz1c60w	Dynamic Patterns: Emotional Episodes within Teachers' Response Practices	130	18	25	65	22
3qr482bb	Multifaceted Equity: Critiquing a First-Year Writing Assessment through Curricular, Performance, and Reliability Lenses	127	62	65
3pc0n4dz	After Implementation: Assessing Student Self-Placement in College Writing Programs	126	26	36	30	34
93b9g3t6	Big Rubrics and Weird Genres: The Futility of Using Generic Assessment Tools Across Diverse Instructional Contexts	126	42	29	26	29
4xb1c9gj	The Effect of Scoring Order on the Independence of Holistic and Analytic Scores	123	31	27	23	42
3c26v2hh	The Effects of Student-Fashioning and Teacher-Pleasing in the Assessment of First-Year Writing Reflective Essays	119	37	19	33	30
2bt3m3nf	This is Not Only a Test: Exploring Structured Ethical Blindness in the Testing Industry	117	15	49	35	18
7m18h956	Validity inquiry of race and shared evaluation practices in a large-scale, university-wide writing portfolio assessment	117	29	32	23	33
2w69x0w5	Shifting the Locus of Control: Why the Common Core State Standards and Emerging Standardized Tests May Reshape College Writing Classrooms	114	27	35	24	28
3zw9h7p9	Stories About Grading Contracts, or How Do I Like Through the Violence I've Done?	112	37	20	25	30
9fw125t3	Informing Self-Placement: A Polyvocal Narrative Case Study	109	22	36	18	33
20w3m5d9	Assessing Academic Discourse: Levels of Competence in Handling Knowledge From Sources	105	36	25	15	29
6qc0j26v	Perceptions of Fairness in Summer Bridge Classrooms with Contract Grades	103	21	18	45	19
1f21q8ck	To Aggregate or Not? Linguistic Features in Automatic Essay Scoring and Feedback Systems	102	32	22	24	24
2c45c0gf	Engaging in Resistant Genres as Antiracist Teacher Response	101	19	19	33	30
3dc6w4hg	What Do We Reward in Reflection? Assessing Reflective Writing with the Index for Metacognitive Knowledge	100	24	22	23	31
7gg6v4gj	It Takes a Campus: Agility in the Development of Directed Self-Placement	100	16	27	25	32
3nf6r4kv	Automated Essay Scoring in Innovative Assessments of Writing from Sources	99	27	21	12	39
8rb1j91b	Access, Digital Writing, and Achievement: The Data in Two Diverse School Districts	96	24	24	38	10
1gk2j1qn	Rhetorical Writing Assessment: The Practice and Theory of Complementarity	95	27	23	17	28

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.