Policy Briefs
Parent: Institute of Transportation Studies at UC Berkeley
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for October, 2024 through January, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9dn2j441 | Multifamily Households Across California are Paying a Lot More to Charge Their Electric Vehicle | 315 | 99 | 216 | 31.4% |
| 2qs445kh | Communities Are Experimenting with Microtransit to Fill Critical Gaps in Public Transit Service – What Have We Learned so Far? | 208 | 52 | 156 | 25.0% |
| 1mw8n13h | Innovative Mobility: Carsharing Outlook | 144 | 108 | 36 | 75.0% |
| 9vx1m1t9 | Impacts of Shared Mobility | 127 | 16 | 111 | 12.6% |
| 8474n9tk | Policy Considerations for Advancing Bidirectional Electric Vehicle Charging in California | 118 | 24 | 94 | 20.3% |
| 3km8b4jw | Decline of Rail Transit Requires New Strategies | 101 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% |
| 5tg2b0dp | Equity Assessment of Transportation Should Incorporate Materials, Supply Chains, and Targeted Mitigation Policies | 88 | 27 | 61 | 30.7% |
| 9nh6w2gq | Public Transit and Shared Mobility COVID-19 Recovery: Policy Options and Research Needs | 81 | 14 | 67 | 17.3% |
| 6rb1j5wb | Transportation Network Companies Might Be Pulling Riders from Public Transit, but This Could Change | 80 | 13 | 67 | 16.3% |
| 514205n7 | Challenges and Opportunities Facing App-Based Gig Drivers Extend Beyond Driver Pay | 79 | 16 | 63 | 20.3% |
| 4hj979ws | Justice-Centered Mapping Tools for Selecting Electric Vehicle Charger Locations | 76 | 15 | 61 | 19.7% |
| 5n138149 | Who Benefits the Most from California’s High-Speed Rail Project? | 74 | 12 | 62 | 16.2% |
| 85v1k5ns | Low-Income Suburban Residents in the San Francisco Bay Area Face Significant Housing and Transportation Issues | 74 | 21 | 53 | 28.4% |
| 1zm5t77t | The First Phase of California’s High-Speed Rail Project Provides the Greatest Economic Benefits Compared to Full Build Out | 72 | 32 | 40 | 44.4% |
| 6j47524x | Mobility Challenges Facing Older Adults: A Contra Costa County Case Study | 60 | 5 | 55 | 8.3% |
| 5rn5g0cn | Real-World Simulations of Life with an Autonomous Vehicle Suggest Increased Mobility and Vehicle Travel | 57 | 4 | 53 | 7.0% |
| 9985x1rx | Pooling Passengers and Services | 52 | 6 | 46 | 11.5% |
| 3s53f1cx | Impacts of Shared Mobility: Pooling | 50 | 5 | 45 | 10.0% |
| 30m9m61b | Creative Reallocation of Curbs, Streets, Sidewalks Accelerated by the Pandemic May be Here to Stay | 47 | 8 | 39 | 17.0% |
| 8g73s8pz | Wildfire Evacuation Planning Can Be Greatly Enhanced by Considering Fire Progression, Communication Systems, and Other Dynamic Factors | 47 | 15 | 32 | 31.9% |
| 4h04w8m1 | Local Governments Strategies to Improve Shared Micromobility Infrastructure | 44 | 15 | 29 | 34.1% |
| 6xp3h69x | Local Government Strategies to Improve Shared Micromobility Infrastructure | 43 | 12 | 31 | 27.9% |
| 6v67k43x | Hydrogen Can Have a Much Lower Carbon Intensity than Fossil Fuels But This Largely Depends on How It Is Produced and Distributed | 42 | 7 | 35 | 16.7% |
| 73t0405d | Shared Mobility Resources: Helping to Understand Emerging Shifts in Transportation | 42 | 21 | 21 | 50.0% |
| 9095n098 | Toll Pricing “Futures” Market Could Reduce Congestion and Increase Revenue | 40 | 6 | 34 | 15.0% |
| 8949c3zd | Are our Transit Systems Ready for Earthquakes? | 38 | 10 | 28 | 26.3% |
| 8w77044h | Overview of Shared Mobility | 36 | 9 | 27 | 25.0% |
| 7vm0d838 | Connected and Automated Vehicle Technology is Not Enough; it Must also be Collaborative | 35 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% |
| 2kq661m0 | A Case Study: Testing Wildfire Evacuation Strategies for Communities in Marin County, California | 34 | 9 | 25 | 26.5% |
| 3ns22813 | Considerations for Mitigating VehicleMiles Traveled under SB 743 | 34 | 5 | 29 | 14.7% |
| 9350c32g | How Might Adjustments to Public Transit Operations Affect COVID-19 Transmission? | 34 | 4 | 30 | 11.8% |
| 9ws6j5fk | Preserving Privacy in Road User Charge (RUC) Architectures | 33 | 5 | 28 | 15.2% |
| 00r5s0vs | Connected and Automated Vehicle Policy Development for California | 32 | 8 | 24 | 25.0% |
| 1k71f2vv | Equity and Shared Mobility | 32 | 15 | 17 | 46.9% |
| 35r8k96t | Where are Private “Smart City” Transportation Technologies Concentrated in California? | 30 | 5 | 25 | 16.7% |
| 83b2n13t | Shared Mobility Policies for California | 29 | 6 | 23 | 20.7% |
| 1d63h6pd | UC Berkeley Develops New User-Friendly Tool to Expedite the Evaluation of Connected Automated Vehicle Technologies | 28 | 5 | 23 | 17.9% |
| 4gk412w6 | The Benefits and Challenges of Incorporating Uber and Lyft in Subsidized Ride Programs that Serve Vulnerable Populations | 28 | 6 | 22 | 21.4% |
| 1nf4n76r | Could Transportation Network Companies help Improve Rail Commuting? | 27 | 9 | 18 | 33.3% |
| 8gh33630 | Dashboard Cameras Combined with AI Provide an Affordable Method for Identifying Curb Usage | 27 | 9 | 18 | 33.3% |
| 8nv3n88g | Adult Bicycle Education Classes Increase Confidence, Feelings of Safety, and Knowledge of Bicycling Rules | 27 | 3 | 24 | 11.1% |
| 6618731x | Congestion Pricing Can Be Equitable If a Portion of the Revenue is Returned to Drivers | 25 | 9 | 16 | 36.0% |
| 9j94q60f | The General Transit Feed Specification Makes Trip-Planning Easier — Especially During a Pandemic — Yet its Use by California Agencies is Uneven | 25 | 5 | 20 | 20.0% |
| 19r0034f | How is the COVID-19 Pandemic Shifting Retail Purchases and Related Travel in the Sacramento Region? | 23 | 2 | 21 | 8.7% |
| 6pw2w52b | Leveraging the Sharing Economy to Expand Shelter and Transportation Resources in California Evacuations | 23 | 9 | 14 | 39.1% |
| 9970g2pb | Intelligent Transportation Systems and Infrastructure: A Series of Briefs for Smart Investments | 23 | 6 | 17 | 26.1% |
| 47s8s0v4 | Climate Adaptation Strategies for California Airports will Require a Holistic Approach, Including New Governance Models | 22 | 5 | 17 | 22.7% |
| 7rm9w4pn | Policy Brief: Social Equity Impacts of Congestion Management Strategies | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% |
| 4xv6z4mj | Insights on Autonomous Vehicle Policy from Early Adopter Cities and Regions | 20 | 11 | 9 | 55.0% |
| 83r4h4r3 | Defining Sensitive Communities Under SB 50 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.