Carbon Sequestration
Parent: California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
eScholarship stats: History by Item for October, 2024 through January, 2025
Item | Title | Total requests | 2025-01 | 2024-12 | 2024-11 | 2024-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ph7c1kh | Carbon Market Investment Criteria for Biochar projects | 47 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 20 |
1056426n | Centralia (Washington) geologic formation CO2 storage assessment | 25 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 10 |
1hp9f7tg | Alaska geologic CO2 storage: Scoping evaluation of deep coal seam and saline aquifer storage potential | 24 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 9 |
1qq3m68d | Certification framework: leakage risk assessment for CO2 injection at the Montezuma Hills site, Solano County, California. | 24 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
57g7w24m | Opportunity assessment for establishing hybrid poplars in California, Oregon and Washington, and Summary of the carbon storage potential for fast growing species (hybrid poplar) in Oregon | 23 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
0hz7301s | An analysis of wildfire fuel treatments as a carbon offset project type | 21 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
3z3908w5 | Background Reports for the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 21 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
5hc547gk | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in Arizona | 21 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
1np0n59w | Project Idea Note: afforestation/restoration of riparian areas along Santa Cruz River, Arizona USA | 20 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
9xg9n2pj | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Lake County, Oregon | 18 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
1268m1mp | Summary of the rangelands suitable for terrestrial carbon sequestration in Shasta County | 17 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
5gv9c890 | Carbon Utilization to Meet California’s Climate Change Goals | 17 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
8c00350j | A Contribution to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB), Phase II | 17 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
07z0c8c8 | Environmental non-governmental organizations’ perceptions of geologic sequestration | 16 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
0cd4g4s8 | The role of social factors in shaping public perception of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US | 16 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
2qt5x4js | Physical Modeling Of CO2 Sequestration | 16 | 8 | 8 | ||
3tp538q9 | Assessment of the Barriers and Value of Applying CO2 Sequestration in California | 16 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
13g526j2 | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in California | 14 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
35r8w5qf | West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) Down-Select Report for Task 7: The King Island Characterization Well at King Island, San Joaquin County, California. | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | |
39c3883f | Emissions and potential emission reductions from hazardous fuel treatments in the WESTCARB region (including 4 appendices) | 14 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
3g35k5gf | Demonstration of conservation-based forest management to sequester carbon on the Bascom Pacific Forest | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | |
5755n5tq | WESTCARB afforestation pilot projects in Shasta County, California | 14 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
4kp9x04j | Research Roadmap of Technologies for Carbon Sequestration Alternatives | 13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
7mn6x3x4 | CO2 resource assessment – oil and gas fields of California | 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
9s01r425 | Seismicity characterization and monitoring at WESTCARB’s proposed Montezuma Hills geologic sequestration site. | 13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | |
2t61h2qq | Demonstration of the Climate Action Reserve Forestry protocols at the LaTour Demonstration State Forest | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |
30z1r87m | Regional characterization for the Arizona: potential of riparian areas for carbon sequestration | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
585485h9 | Potential for induced seismicity related to the Northern California CO2 reduction projection pilot test, Solano County, California. | 12 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
7890t6d3 | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Shasta County, California | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
63c8g8vk | Storage estimates – Washington and Oregon onshore and offshore sedimentary basins | 11 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
37r1w6x3 | Anticipatory Regulation: Lessons from fracking and insights for Greenhouse Gas Removal innovation and governance | 10 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
9258g443 | Findings and Recommendations by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
17q6q5jp | Characterization of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with conversion of forest to residential Development the Puget Sound, Washington. | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
1tn8n7gq | Reforestation as a Forest Carbon Project: An Outreach Toolkit for Conservation Organizations and Landowners | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | |
5qx7m29p | Assessment of the Potential for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Reactions with Mafic Rocks and by Enhanced Oil Recovery in Nevada | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | |
3rq2g4sg | California's Policy Approach to Develop Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration as a Mitigation Technology | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
4t191183 | Supplemental View of the California CCS Review Panel Recommendations | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
4240468x | Community perceptions of carbon sequestration – insights from California | 6 | 1 | 5 |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.