Open Access Policy Deposits

Parent: UCLA Civil and Environmental Engineering

eScholarship stats: History by Item for December, 2024 through March, 2025

Item	Title	Total requests	2025-03	2025-02	2025-01	2024-12
36t9s0mp	Factors and Processes Affecting Delta Levee System Vulnerability	163	46	51	32	34
0fz7h64j	Estimating Undrained Strength of Clays from Direct Shear Testing at Fast Displacement Rates	150	40	40	39	31
7zq911jz	A general method to synthesize and sinter bulk ceramics in seconds	127	30	24	28	45
70n5p7mc	Reverse osmosis membrane biofouling: causes, consequences and countermeasures	123	28	27	32	36
8gv2j7dr	Updated ground motion spectral matching requirements in the 2015 NEHRP recommended seismic provisions	115	43	35	24	13
2bx8311x	Unsupervised machine learning for detecting soil layer boundaries from cone penetration test data	102	17	39	31	15
9t09660m	Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical aspects	100	25	23	17	35
8bj493bc	Settlements and excess pore pressure generation in peaty soils under embankments during cyclic loading	97	24	31	19	23
8q37k1gp	A critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States	89	29	16	29	15
91z0j94c	Calcination-free production of calcium hydroxide at sub-boiling temperatures	89	23	20	27	19
2sc5g220	Site-to-Site Standard Deviation Model for Central and Eastern North America	88	10	37	27	14
1gz7c50w	Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects	86	23	21	20	22
3bn528xc	NGA-SUB GROUND MOTION DATABASE	84	11	22	26	25
5fc796tk	A Constitutive Model Controlling Damping for 2D and 3D Site Response	83	16	25	20	22
5w9864xb	Fracture Toughness of Silicate Glasses: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations	82	19	18	20	25
280468kc	Evaluating connected vehicle-based weather responsive management strategies using weather-sensitive microscopic simulation	78	27	23	19	9
1qm5j970	A screen analysis procedure for seismic slope stability	76	17	14	23	22
33r8887m	Laboratory Component of Next-Generation Liquefaction Project Database	76	21	16	23	16
1x6139kd	Recommendations on best available science for the United States National Seismic Hazard Model	75	14	22	17	22
3037q1t6	Nonlinear Site Amplification as Function of 30m Shear Wave Velocity	75	16	21	18	20
2546f8hw	Panel Review of Ground Motion Characterization Model in 2023 NSHM	74	18	27	14	15
7db3d49z	Nonlinear seismic ground response analysis: code usage protocols and verification against vertical array data	70	16	23	16	15
049660rm	A proposed seismic velocity profile database model	68	18	14	22	14
8092q930	UV exposure to PET microplastics increases their downward mobility in stormwater biofilters undergoing freeze–thaw cycles	68	18	15	16	19
8xx7w310	Failure of Tapo Canyon Tailings Dam	64	9	24	12	19
5r53b2ht	Author Correction: A critical review of point-of-use drinking water treatment in the United States	63	12	13	20	18
12f5332m	Use of Exact Solutions of Wave Propagation Problems to Guide Implementation of Nonlinear Seismic Ground Response Analysis Procedures	61	16	23	16	6
3mr1w33t	Engineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motion Coherency and Amplitude Variability	61	23	14	10	14
5ch0f8mg	Full Scale Cyclic Testing of Foundation Support Systems for Highway Bridges. Part II: Abutment Backwalls	59	9	19	10	21
0jk5d8nh	Impacts of 2020 Beirut Explosion on Port Infrastructure and Nearby Buildings	58	18	10	13	17
1td7368m	Analysis of foundation damping from theoretical models and forced vibration testing	57	12	21	15	9
7c5870pf	A general framework for modeling subregional path effects	57	9	20	17	11
4580n511	Performance of NGA-East GMMs and Site Amplification Models Relative to CENA Ground Motions	56	18	18	13	7
84v1r3t8	Strong ground motions and damage patterns from the 1999 Duzce earthquake in Turkey	56	8	16	12	20
7qp9w0tb	Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings	55	20	11	8	16
44c450q3	Molecular mechanisms of thickness-dependent water desalination in polyamide reverse-osmosis membranes	54	15	18	10	11
019523j6	Assessment of soil-structure interaction modeling strategies for response history analysis of buildings	53	17	19	7	10
48t8k8cd	Subsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey	53	13	14	15	11
7c82q4gf	DesignSafe: New Cyberinfrastructure for Natural Hazards Engineering	53	15	25	9	4
28p3k1rj	Forced Vibration Testing of a Four-Story Reinforced Concrete Building Utilizing the nees@UCLA Mobile Field Laboratory	51	24	11	11	5
9731j6bz	Reliability of low frequency mHVSR ordinates	50	12	10	15	13
1hc2543n	Radiation Damping of Shallow Foundations on Nonlinear Soil Medium	49	21	9	13	6
0jh8z8jj	Documentation of soil conditions at liquefaction and non-liquefaction sites from 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake	48	10	18	14	6
3wm8s4pg	Findings from a decade of ground motion simulation validation research and a path forward	48	9	12	7	20
5427j7f3	Applications of non-ergodic site response in ground motion modeling	48	10	17	10	11
6g64x0rs	A reverse-selective ion exchange membrane for the selective transport of phosphates via an outer-sphere complexation–diffusion pathway	48	18	11	12	7
90b2c6w9	Implications of mHVSR Spatial Variability on Site Response Predictability	48	8	9	12	19
24w4q3jx	Rocking Response of Free-Standing Blocks Under Cycloidal Pulses	47	16	9	15	7
3nd293hk	An overview of the great Alaska earthquake of 1964.	47	14	11	10	12
0cx1452c	Variations between foundation-level and free-field earthquake ground motions	46	8	15	8	15

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.