California Digital Library
Parent: UC Office of the President
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for December, 2024 through March, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9p9863nc | The ARK Identifier Scheme | 415 | 31 | 384 | 7.5% |
| 7tf5q7n3 | Primer on Data Management: What you always wanted to know | 332 | 37 | 295 | 11.1% |
| 6xr6q38m | Building a National Finding Aid Network: Final Report | 239 | 17 | 222 | 7.1% |
| 3tv1m5xj | Summary of Research: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 159 | 27 | 132 | 17.0% |
| 2zm9x47c | Persistence statements: describing digital stickiness | 149 | 19 | 130 | 12.8% |
| 94f35801 | Big data and the future of ecology | 129 | 85 | 44 | 65.9% |
| 0bj150gj | Outcomes, Questions, and Answers: “The Right to Deposit (R2D) Uniform guidance to ensure author compliance and public access” | 124 | 10 | 114 | 8.1% |
| 5sp13112 | Finding Aid Aggregation at a Crossroads | 114 | 15 | 99 | 13.2% |
| 0wf3j9cw | Significant Properties, Authenticity, Provenance, Representation Information and OAIS Information | 113 | 39 | 74 | 34.5% |
| 8vh1k54f | UC HathiTrust ETAS Assessment - Summative Report to CoUL | 94 | 8 | 86 | 8.5% |
| 1wm2b563 | Methods to Tame the Madness: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Assessment Techniques for Online Finding Aid and Website Design | 91 | 7 | 84 | 7.7% |
| 73m910w8 | Ten persistent myths about persistent identifiers | 91 | 8 | 83 | 8.8% |
| 7hn3m08f | User Interviews: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 87 | 17 | 70 | 19.5% |
| 9jw4964t | Practices, Trends, and Recommendations in Technical Appendix Usage for Selected Data-Intensive Disciplines | 83 | 10 | 73 | 12.0% |
| 5v75k1k6 | DEI Efforts Across GLAM Organizations: A Report by the GLAM Diversity Subgroup of the DLF Committee for Equity and Inclusion. | 82 | 0 | 82 | 0.0% |
| 90k6w2wf | EAD Analysis: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 78 | 12 | 66 | 15.4% |
| 5qp9z6tb | Pop-up Survey: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 70 | 13 | 57 | 18.6% |
| 9wx8337z | “Make it so”: Sustainable, Academy-Owned Publishing Infrastructure with CDL, Michigan, & Janeway | 67 | 3 | 64 | 4.5% |
| 0kd7d5m0 | Increasing discovery of archives: A project to provide better pathways to archival records in cultural heritage collections | 66 | 5 | 61 | 7.6% |
| 6bt4v3zs | The Human Face of Digital Preservation: Organizational and Staff Challenges, and Initiatives at the Bibliothèque nationale de France | 66 | 15 | 51 | 22.7% |
| 2gs3p6jx | Memento Mundi: Are Virtual Worlds History? | 65 | 7 | 58 | 10.8% |
| 3g64n275 | Toward a National Archival Finding Aid Network - From Planning Initiative to Project and Program: An Action Plan | 65 | 3 | 62 | 4.6% |
| 81s9129f | Focus Group Interviews: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 65 | 9 | 56 | 13.8% |
| 08s7w2fd | Advancing Scholarship through Digital Critical Editions: Mark Twain Project Online | 61 | 4 | 57 | 6.6% |
| 7d3465vg | Digital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments | 61 | 12 | 49 | 19.7% |
| 5xm3v98h | Preserving the Digital Memory of the Government of Canada: Influence and Collaboration with Records Creators | 58 | 5 | 53 | 8.6% |
| 4vr6n902 | UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey | 54 | 13 | 41 | 24.1% |
| 5313h6k9 | An Emergent Micro-Services Approach to Digital Curation Infrastructure | 53 | 6 | 47 | 11.3% |
| 14h35961 | Curating Scientific Research Data for the Long Term: A Preservation Analysis Method in Context | 50 | 13 | 37 | 26.0% |
| 0t2075qc | Chronopolis: Preserving our Digital Heritage | 49 | 8 | 41 | 16.3% |
| 38g232wc | Distributed Digital Preservation: Technical, Sustainability, and Organizational Developments | 49 | 26 | 23 | 53.1% |
| 23b3225n | LIFE3: Predicting Long Term Digital Preservation Costs | 47 | 5 | 42 | 10.6% |
| 8089m1v1 | Towards a Methodology for Software Preservation | 47 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% |
| 8525r8cn | Where the Semantic Web and Web 2.0 Meet Format Risk Management: P2 Registry | 46 | 13 | 33 | 28.3% |
| 050385r2 | Cobweb: Collaborative Collection Development for Web Archives | 44 | 4 | 40 | 9.1% |
| 2mw6v93b | Dash: Improving Community Repositories for Better Data Sharing | 44 | 8 | 36 | 18.2% |
| 53z897zb | Born Broken: Fonts and Information Loss in Legacy Digital Documents | 44 | 13 | 31 | 29.5% |
| 89c466mn | Cobweb: Collaborative Collection Development for Web Archives | 43 | 1 | 42 | 2.3% |
| 9vb753xd | Towards Support for Long-Term Digital Preservation in Product Life Cycle Management | 43 | 7 | 36 | 16.3% |
| 51r4q7kw | Supporting research data mangement at the University of California | 42 | 2 | 40 | 4.8% |
| 7sk6659n | Digital Archeology: Recovering Digital Objects from Audio Waveforms | 42 | 4 | 38 | 9.5% |
| 1dt1v1pc | DataUp: Further Development and Community Building | 41 | 1 | 40 | 2.4% |
| 7w2390pj | Into the Archive: Potential and Limits of Standardizing the Ingest | 41 | 4 | 37 | 9.8% |
| 12p437bd | Implementing Metadata that Guides Digital Preservation Services | 40 | 2 | 38 | 5.0% |
| 6bw3q1x1 | A Framework for Distributed Preservation Workflows | 39 | 4 | 35 | 10.3% |
| 8dd2m5qw | Are You Ready? Assessing Whether Organisations are Prepared for Digital Preservation | 39 | 8 | 31 | 20.5% |
| 70q7f8kc | Tools for Preservation and Use of Complex and Diverse Digital Resources | 38 | 11 | 27 | 28.9% |
| 37t0658s | Integrating Multiple Platforms with OpenID Connect, A Shared Authentication Service | 37 | 5 | 32 | 13.5% |
| 0s38n5w4 | Integrating Metadata Standards to Support Long-Term Preservation of Digital Assets: Developing Best Practices for Expressing Preservation Metadata in a Container Format | 36 | 6 | 30 | 16.7% |
| 5b1044cd | “The Links in the Chain”: Connecting Undergraduates with Primary Source Materials at the University of California | 36 | 3 | 33 | 8.3% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.