Giant planets are characterized by their predominant gaseous composition, with hydrogen and helium as the major constituents. The presence of trace gases in the atmosphere has two effects. Condensible trace gases form clouds, restricting visible and near-infrared observations mostly to the top-most cloud layer. This severely limits our understanding of the atmospheric composition and global circulation, both of which are hidden below the clouds. However, their interaction with radiation also provides a window through the clouds. We can use spectroscopy to retrieve the distribution below the clouds and to investigate the three-dimensional structure of the atmosphere through mid-infrared and radio observations.
One of the key trace gases in the atmospheres of giant planets is ammonia (NH3). Ammonia constitutes a small fraction of the atmosphere (approximately 300 parts per million), but it serves as a valuable tracer for the background circulation by examining its distribution and temporal evolution. In the radio regime, the spectral absorption features of ammonia are highly pressure-broadened, allowing us to probe depths ranging from tens to thousands of bars. Through comparisons of radio observations with model atmospheres, where we can manipulate the distribution of trace gases and temperature profiles, we can constrain the atmospheric properties of Jupiter to hundreds of bars. These comparisons provide valuable insights into the processes shaping the atmosphere.
Prior to the arrival of the Juno mission, radio observations had already indicated that Jupiter’s atmosphere is neither latitudinally nor vertically well-mixed below the cloud deck. Based on these earlier observations, it was believed that the water condensation layer around 6 bars acted as a barrier for atmospheric circulation, below which the atmosphere was considered fully convective and well-mixed. However, the presence of synchrotron radiation, the dominant source of radiation at lower frequencies, limited our understanding to altitudes above the water condensation layer.
The arrival of the Juno mission in the Jovian system has enabled us to overcome this lim2 itation by descending below the synchrotron radiation belts (peaking at 1.5 jovian radii). Throughout my Ph.D. research, I have developed tools to independently calibrate and process instrument data from radio observatories, focusing primarily on NASA’s Juno Microwave Radiometer (MWR) and NRAO’s Very Large Array (VLA). The open-source pipelines I developed retrieve relevant observational quantities (brightness temperature and its dependence on the emission angle) along with their uncertainties. Subsequently, I developed and compared models with observations, which allowed me to study the distribution of ammonia on Jupiter. The enhancement in nitrogen (2.66+0.27 −0.17 solar) in Jupiter’s deep atmosphere was found to be lower than previously estimated, and consistent with the noble gases in the atmosphere as obtained by the Galileo probe.
A more surprising discovery was the depth to which the atmosphere appears to be depleted (20-30 bar), much deeper than can be explained by dynamics or conventional microphysics. This finding highlights that Jupiter might have a stably-stratified troposphere. The distribution of ammonia revealed that zones and and belts on Jupiter can be traced below the cloud deck; in the tropical regions extending down to 20 bars, while the subtropics and mid-latitudes are confined to the upper few bars. Deeper in the atmosphere, around 30 bars, the signal reverses, showing enhanced belts compared to the depleted zones. This distribution could be explained by a stacked circulation cell model, where the middle and lower troposphere cells have opposite circulation directions.
By examining the longitudinal structure of the atmosphere using data from both VLA and MWR, I was able to analyze the weather patterns on Jupiter. The majority of the variability in Jupiter’s atmosphere is confined to the upper few bars, affirming earlier theories and observations that weather is a shallow phenomenon on the gas giant. Even in the most dynamically active region (the North Equatorial Belt), the weather extends only to approximately the water condensation layer. The only three features I identified capable of affecting the lower troposphere were an anti-cyclone, an ammonia plume as part of the trapped equatorial Rossby wave, and the signature of precipitation, which appeared to deposit ammonia below the water condensation layer.
The breakthrough in understanding came from studying the impact of a giant outbreak in the South Equatorial Belt. By comparing the MWR observations of the outbreak with orbit-averaged observations, I demonstrated that the storm affected the deep troposphere down to approximately 20 bars. These are the first observations showing that storms deplete the upper atmosphere in ammonia and deposit ammonia, while also cooling the lower troposphere at much greater depths than previously anticipated on Jupiter. The mechanism through which the atmosphere is depleted favors supercooled water, rapidly updrafted in storms, absorbing ammonia to form water-ammonia hail, which is subsequently deposited around 15-25 bars. This process shows how small- and large-scale processes interact to shape the atmosphere of Jupiter. This work has shown that the gas giant atmosphere are not as convective as previously thought, and are controlled by the interaction of both local microphysics and the background large-scale circulation.