Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Scholarly Works (10 results)

  • Thesis
  • Peer Reviewed
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations (2024)

Substance use disorder (SUD) among the US Veterans has increased. SUD is also highly prevalent among the homeless and housing unstable Veterans. Despite the importance of primary care at the VA as the gateway to other services, the effect of SUD and housing instability on several areas of Veteran’s primary care experience has not been widely explored.Using a nationwide retrospective cohort of Veterans in primary care between 2019 and 2022, this dissertation examines telehealth use and attrition from primary care services among Veterans with and without SUD and housing instability. SUD and housing instability were identified through ICD-10 coding from VA administrative data. In Chapter Two, we compare patterns of Veteran telehealth and video use before and after the onset of COVID-19 by SUD diagnosis. In adjusted analyses, we find slightly higher rate of telehealth use and lower rates of video use among Veterans with SUD. In Chapter Three, we compare primary care attrition rates between Veterans with and without SUD between 2020 and 2022. We find a substantially lower attrition among higher users of VA primary care services, but a higher rate of attrition among patients with SUD. In Chapter Four, we examine the transitions of housing instability states among Veterans in primary care and the combined impact housing instability and SUD on telehealth use and attrition from primary care services. We find high rates of transition from homelessness but Veterans with SUD were more likely to remain homeless. We find higher rate of telehealth use and lower rate of video use among Veterans with SUD and housing instability. We find substantially lower attrition among higher users of primary care services at the VA, but higher rates of attrition among patients with SUD and housing instability. These findings underscore the importance of maintaining telehealth access for Veterans with vulnerabilities such as SUD and housing instability. SUD and housing instability should remain high priority areas for the VA, and an important focus of primary care activities. Increasing video visits in the VA will require attention to the challenges of video for Veterans with housing instability with and without SUD.

    Cover page: Attrition and Telehealth Utilization for Primary Care Services among Veterans by Substance Use Disorder and Housing Instability
    • Article
    • Peer Reviewed
    UCLA Previously Published Works (2022)

    Objective

    Coprescription of opioids and benzodiazepines (BDZ) is associated with adverse outcomes, including greater healthcare utilization and overdose risk. This study aims to examine opioid and BDZ coprescription, dosing, and mortality among patients with and without opioid use disorder (OUD) in a large healthcare system.

    Methods

    Using data from the California state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program during 2010 to 2014 linked with a large healthcare system electronic health record database and mortality records from the Centers for Disease Control National Death Index, this study examined 5202 patients (1978 with OUD, 3224 controls). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine relationships between most recent BDZ and opioid prescription, and their interaction with respect to mortality.

    Results

    About 10.5% of the sample died on or before December 31, 2014. About 17.7% were prescribed BDZ during the final month of observation. Individuals with OUD were prescribed higher average BDZ and opioid doses than those without OUD. After adjusting for covariates, increased prescribed doses of BDZ (odds ratio [OR]=1.34, 95%CI: 1.15-1.55 per 10 mg/d increment) and opioids (OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.02-1.05 per 10 mg/d increment) were positively associated with mortality. Non-OUD patients who received both BDZ and opioid prescriptions had a higher mortality than those who received only BDZ or opioids (The ratio of odds ratio (ROR) = 3.83, 95%CI: 1.78-8.21).

    Conclusions

    Study findings highlight significant mortality associated with the coprescription of opioids and BDZ in a general healthcare setting. Further research is needed to elucidate factors associated with mortality among non-OUD patients who are co-prescribed opioids and BDZ.
      Cover page: Association Between Benzodiazepine and Opioid Prescription and Mortality Among Patients in a Large Healthcare System
      • Article
      • Peer Reviewed
      UCLA Previously Published Works (2019)
      AIMS:To compare long-term criminal justice outcomes among opioid-dependent individuals randomized to receive buprenorphine or methadone. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:A 5-year follow-up was conducted in 2011-14 of 303 opioid-dependent participants entering three opioid treatment programs in California, USA in 2006-09 and randomized to receive either buprenorphine/naloxone or methadone. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR:Participants received buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP; n = 179) or methadone (MET; n = 124) for 24 weeks and then were tapered off their treatment over ≤ 8 weeks or referred for ongoing clinical treatment. Midway through the study, the randomization scheme was switched from 1 : 1 BUP : MET to 2 : 1 because of higher dropout in the BUP arm. MEASUREMENTS:Study outcomes included arrests and self-reported incarceration. Predictors included randomization condition (buprenorphine versus methadone), age, gender, race/ethnicity, use of cocaine, drug injection in the 30 days prior to baseline and study site. Treatment status (buprenorphine, methadone, none) during follow-up was included as a time-varying covariate. FINDINGS:There was no significant difference by randomization condition in the proportion arrested (buprenorphine: 55.3%, methadone: 54.0%) or incarcerated (40.9%, 47.3%) during follow-up. Among methadone-randomized individuals, arrest was less likely with methadone treatment (0.50, 0.35-0.72) during follow-up (relative to no treatment) and switching to buprenorphine had a lower likelihood of arrest than those receiving no treatment (0.39, 0.18-0.87). Among buprenorphine-randomized individuals, arrest was less likely with receipt of buprenorphine (0.49, 0.33-0.75) during follow-up and switching to methadone had a similar likelihood of arrest as methadone-randomized individuals receiving no treatment. Likelihood of arrest was also negatively associated with older age (0.98, 0.96-1.00); it was positively associated with Hispanic ethnicity (1.63, 1.04-2.56), cocaine use (2.00, 1.33-3.03), injection drug use (2.19, 1.26-3.83), and study site. CONCLUSIONS:In a US sample of people treated for opioid use disorder, continued treatment with either buprenorphine or methadone was associated with a reduction in arrests relative to no treatment. Cocaine use, injection drug use, Hispanic ethnicity and younger age were associated with higher likelihood of arrest.
        Cover page: Criminal justice outcomes over 5 years after randomization to buprenorphine‐naloxone or methadone treatment for opioid use disorder
        • Article
        • Peer Reviewed
        UCLA Previously Published Works (2020)

        Background and aims

        As treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) expands within general healthcare settings such as primary care, mechanisms to facilitate decision-making processes are increasingly necessary. Decision aids have the capacity to bolster existing resources in diverse treatment settings by increasing knowledge of treatment options and facilitating shared decision making. The aim of this study is to develop and test a patient decision aid for medication treatment for opioid use disorder (PtDA-MOUD) that assists individuals with OUD in making informed decisions about treatment at the time of initial clinical visit. Use of the PtDA-MOUD will be further tested in diverse treatment settings within the California Hub and Spoke System developed under the SAMHSA State Targeted Response to the Opioid Crisis grants.

        Methods

        The PtDA-MOUD was iteratively developed with input from a scientific expert panel and both patient and provider focus groups, incorporating International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Thirty-six patients with OUD entering treatment pilot tested the PtDA and completed assessments, and results from clinical records were compared with matched controls who did not receive the PtDA. A clinical profile based on assessment data was created for use within the clinical visit.

        Results

        The developed decision aid provides information on MOUD and captures patient characteristics relevant to medication treatment decisions. Feedback indicated that the PtDA-MOUD was feasible to implement and useful. Though the small sample size limited the ability to detect significant differences (p > .05), a greater number of individuals who reviewed the PtDA (37%) were inducted on MOUD than controls (11%) and received MOUD for more days (M = 14.0, SD = 24.7) than controls (M = 8.4; SD = 22.5). Moreover, the difference in means for days receiving MOUD had an approximately medium effect size (r = 0.25).

        Conclusions

        Patient perceptions of the decision aid were favorable and it showed promise as a tool in the OUD treatment process. Pilot testing results suggested preliminary positive effects on MOUD initiation. Future phases of this study will further investigate the usefulness of this tool. ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier:NCT03394261.
          Cover page: Patient decision aid for medication treatment for opioid use disorder (PtDA-MOUD): Rationale, methodology, and preliminary results.
          • Article
          • Peer Reviewed
          UCLA Previously Published Works (2019)
          Studies on the relationships between marijuana use and quality of life have reported mixed findings. Based on a survey of 123 marijuana users conducted in Los Angeles during 2017-2018, we investigated the relationships between marijuana use frequency, severity of marijuana-related problems, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Results indicated that (1) marijuana use frequency was positively related to severity of marijuana-related problems; (2) severity of marijuana-related problems was negatively related to mental domain of HRQoL but was not significantly related to physical domain of HRQoL; and (3) marijuana use frequency was positively associated with mental health symptoms and physical health conditions, and both in turn were negatively linked to mental and physical domains of HRQoL, respectively. Reduction of marijuana-related problems and mitigation of mental and physical health problems may improve HRQoL among marijuana users. The study findings may contribute to developing treatment interventions for marijuana use that simultaneously address marijuana-related problems and associated mental and physical issues.
            Cover page: Relationships between marijuana use, severity of marijuana-related problems, and health-related quality of life
            • Article
            • Peer Reviewed
            UCLA Previously Published Works (2018)
            Treatment for substance use disorders has traditionally been abstinence-oriented, but evaluating the merits of low-level cannabis use as potential treatment endpoint may identify benefits that are clinically relevant for treatment-seeking individuals who do not attain abstinence. This study explores if reduction in cannabis use to a lower level of use is related to improved physical health, mental health, and perceived cognitive functions. Study participants with a history of problematic cannabis use (n = 111) completed assessments. Regression models were used to explore the relationship between past 30-day cannabis use levels (abstinent [57%], low use [22%] defined as less than or equal to 3 days per week, and heavy use [22%] defined as 4 or more days of use per week) and functional status in physical health, mental health, and cognition. Compared to heavy users, both abstinent and low-use individuals were similarly associated with better global health, appetite, and depression outcomes. Abstinent users also reported improved sleep, anxiety, and self-reported cognitive functioning relative to heavy users. Thus, reduction in cannabis use to lower levels is associated with beneficial outcomes important to health and other areas of functioning in individuals with problematic cannabis use.
              Cover page: Reduction in Cannabis Use and Functional Status in Physical Health, Mental Health, and Cognition
              • Article
              • Peer Reviewed
              UCLA Previously Published Works (2021)

              Background

              Individuals treated for opioid use disorder (OUD) have high rates of psychiatric disorders potentially diminishing treatment outcomes. We examined long-term treatment experiences and outcomes by type of psychiatric disorder among participants who participated in the Starting Treatment with Agonist Replacement Therapies (START) study and its follow-up study.

              Methods

              We categorized the 593 participants who completed the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) during the START follow-up study into four mutually exclusive groups to indicate current psychiatric diagnosis: 1) bipolar disorder (BPD; n = 51), 2) major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 85), 3) anxiety disorder (AXD; n = 121), and 4) no comorbid mental disorder (NMD; n = 336). We compared participants' baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes.

              Results

              Groups with mental disorders had worse substance use outcomes and poorer psychosocial functioning than the NMD group. Participants with BPD had significantly more self-reported days using opioids (Mean: 8.6 for BPD vs. 3.4 days for NMD, p < 0.01) and heroin (Mean: 6.4 for BPD vs. 2.0 for MDD, 3.1 days for NMD, p < 0.05) in the 30 days prior to the final interview. Compared to patients without mental disorders, patients with MDD spent more time engaged with OUD pharmacotherapy during the ∼16-month period between MINI and final interview (mean: 71.6 % vs. 50.6 %; p < 0.001).

              Conclusions

              Our results show that treatment outcomes in individuals with OUD vary by psychiatric comorbidity groups, which supports the need for mental health assessment and treatment for psychiatric conditions in the context of pharmacotherapy for patients with OUD.
                Cover page: Psychiatric comorbidity and treatment outcomes in patients with opioid use disorder: Results from a multisite trial of buprenorphine-naloxone and methadone
                • Article
                • Peer Reviewed
                UCLA Previously Published Works (2018)
                Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic, relapsing condition with severe negative health consequences. Previous studies have reported that 5-year opioid abstinence is a good predictor of reduced likelihoods of relapse, but factors that shape long-term opioid abstinence are poorly understood. The present study is based on data from a prospective study of 699 adults with OUD who had been randomized to either methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone and who were followed for at least 5 years. During the 5 years prior to the participants' last follow-up interview, 232 (33.2%) had achieved 5-year abstinence from heroin. Of those 232, 145 (20.7% of the total) had remained abstinent from both heroin and other opioids (e.g., hydrocodone, oxycodone, other opioid analgesics, excluding methadone or buprenorphine). Compared to non-abstinent individuals, those in both categories of opioid abstinence had lower problem severity in health and social functioning at the final follow-up. Logistic regression results indicated that cocaine users and injection drug users were less likely to achieve 5-year heroin abstinence, whereas Hispanics (vs. whites) and those treated in clinics on the West Coast (vs. East) were less likely to achieve 5-year abstinence from heroin and other opioids. For both abstinence category groups, abstinence was positively associated with older age at first opioid use, lower impulsivity, longer duration of treatment for OUD, and greater social support. Reducing cocaine use and injection drug use and increasing social support and retention in treatment may help maintain long-term abstinence from opioids among individuals treated with agonist pharmacotherapy.
                  Cover page: Correlates of Long-Term Opioid Abstinence After Randomization to Methadone Versus Buprenorphine/Naloxone in a Multi-Site Trial
                  • Article
                  • Peer Reviewed
                  UCLA Previously Published Works (2022)

                  Aims

                  To investigate whether reduction in opioid use differs when treated by either buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP) or methadone (MET) among adults with comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD) and mental disorders.

                  Design, setting and participants

                  In a randomized controlled trial, adults with OUD were randomized to 24 weeks of either BUP or MET treatment and were followed up in 3-yearly assessments. The present secondary analyses were based on 597 participants who completed all assessments.

                  Measurements

                  The outcome measure was the number of days of using opioids per month during the follow-up period. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used to classify participants into three groups: life-time mood disorder (n = 302), life-time mental disorder other than mood disorder (n = 114) and no mental disorder (n = 181). Medication treatment (BUP, MET, no treatment) during the follow-up period was a time-varying predictor.

                  Findings

                  Based on zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) mixed regression analysis, it was found that relative to no treatment, opioid use during the follow-up was significantly reduced by BUP [odds ratio (OR) = 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07-0.21 for any use; risk ratio (RR) = 0.77, 95% CI =0.66-0.89 for days of use] and by MET [OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.25-0.45 for any use; RR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.72-0.84 for days of use]. Relative to MET, BUP was associated with a lower likelihood of any opioid use among participants with mood disorders (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.74) and for participants without mental disorder (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.21-0.66) and fewer number of days using opioids (RR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.25-0.56) among participants with other mental disorders.

                  Conclusions

                  Among adults with comorbid opioid use disorder and mental disorders, treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone produced greater reductions in opioid use than treatment with methadone.
                    Cover page: Long‐term follow‐up assessment of opioid use outcomes among individuals with comorbid mental disorders and opioid use disorder treated with buprenorphine or methadone in a randomized clinical trial
                    • Article
                    • Peer Reviewed
                    UCLA Previously Published Works (2019)

                    Objective

                    Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) are intended to help reduce prescription drug misuse and opioid overdose, yet little is known about the longitudinal patterns of opioid prescribing that may be associated with mortality. This study investigated longitudinal opioid prescribing patterns among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and without OUD in relation to mortality using PDMP data.

                    Methods

                    Growth modeling was used to examine opioid prescription data from the California PDMP for a 4-year period before death or a comparable period ending in 2014 for those remaining from a sample of 7728 patients (2576 with OUD, and 5152 matched non-OUD controls) treated in a large healthcare system.

                    Results

                    Compared to controls, individuals with OUD (alive and deceased) had received significantly more opioid prescriptions, greater number of days' supply, and steeper increases of opioid dosages over time. For morphine equivalents (ME, in grams), the interaction of OUD and mortality was significant at both intercept (β = 10.4, SE = 4.4, P < 0.05) and slope (β = 6.0, SE = 1.1, P < 0.001); deceased OUD patients demonstrated the sharpest increase (ie, an average yearly increment of 7.84 grams over alive patients without OUD) and ended with the highest level of opioids prescribed before they died (ie, 20.2 grams higher). Older age, public health insurance, cancer, and chronic pain were associated with higher number and dose of opioid prescriptions.

                    Conclusions

                    Besides the amount of prescriptions, clinicians must be alert to patterns of opioid prescription such as escalating dosage as critical warning signals for heightened mortality risks, particularly among patients with OUD.
                      Cover page: Escalating Opioid Dose Is Associated With Mortality
                      Top