This dissertation asks how artists working in European styles in North America from approximately 1750-1860 participated in their local ecosystems. Relying on materials collected from daily life, from bones to potatoes, rag-based paper to eggs, artists moved materials through cycles of consumption, waste, and reuse. By focusing on these materials, this project offers an expanded framework for considering artists’ role in the environment around them. Common materials, whether food, non-edible supplies found in or near the home, ingredients used by non-artist segments of the population, or substances that traveling artists encountered on the road, offer important links between artists and their environment. Examination of the many ways that artists considered food as a material for making their work connects them to larger narratives involving colonial conditions and land stewardship. Examples of artists turning to non-edible, commonplace supplies further underscore the importance of quotidian materials in forming perceptions of artwork as well as artists’ close ties to household and other daily modes of consumption, waste, and reuse. By utilizing common materials, artists situate themselves among larger segments of society implicated in using and producing these materials and among many non-artists engaged in similar practices. These contexts provide an expansive basis for understanding artists’ roles in the material and environmental conditions of their time.
Revealing these relationships not only expands current understandings of the role of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century art in the North American environment, particularly in established eastern art centers, but also proposes a broader framework for studying art through an ecocritical lens. Looking beyond these settler geographies through the perspectives of artists traveling far beyond their studios, however, further demonstrates the many ways that quotidian art materials can also function as a focal point for the problems, biases, and limitations of colonialism. With growing environmental crises at hand, this project insists that making art is not only about communicating concepts; the physicality of the process bears meaning for both the past and today.