Background

Detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) among patients with hypertension (HTN) provides an opportunity for early treatment, potentially mitigating risk of CKD progression and cardiovascular complications. Differences in UACR testing patterns among racial/ethnic populations at risk for CKD could contribute to known disparities in CKD complications.

Methods

We examined the prevalence of UACR testing among low-income adult primary care patients with HTN, defined by a new administrative code for HTN or 2 clinic blood pressures >140/90 mm Hg between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2017, in one public health-care delivery system with a high prevalence of end-stage kidney disease among race/ethnic minorities. Logistic regression was used to identify odds of UACR testing within 1 year of a HTN diagnosis, overall, and by racial/ethnic subgroup, adjusted for demographic factors, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and HTN severity. Models were also stratified by diabetes status.

Results

The cohort (n = 16,414) was racially/ethnically diverse (16% White, 21% Black, 34% Asian, 19% Hispanic, and 10% other) and 51% female. Only 35% of patients had UACR testing within 1 year of a HTN diagnosis. Among individuals without diabetes, odds of UACR testing were higher among Asians, Blacks, and Other subgroups compared to Whites (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.19; 95% CI 1.00-1.42 for Blacks; aOR 1.33; 1.13-1.56 for Asians; aOR 1.30; 1.04-1.60 for Other) but were not significantly different between Hispanics and Whites (aOR 1.17; 0.97-1.39). Among individuals with diabetes, only Asians had higher odds of UACR testing compared to Whites (aOR 1.35; 1.12-1.63).

Conclusions

Prevalence of UACR testing among low-income patients with HTN is low in one public health-care delivery system, with higher odds of UACR testing among racial/ethnic minority subgroups compared to Whites without diabetes and similar odds among those with diabetes. If generalizable, less albuminuria testing may not explain higher prevalence of kidney failure in racial/ethnic minorities.

Background

The Kidney Awareness Registry and Education (KARE) trial examined the impact of a multilevel intervention on blood pressure control among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a public health care delivery system. KARE consisted of a clinic-based intervention (a primary care CKD registry with point-of-care provider notifications and quarterly feedback related to CKD management) and a patient-directed intervention [a CKD self-management support (CKD-SMS) program that included low literacy educational materials, automated telephone-administered self-management modules and telephone health coaching]. We explored the acceptability of these interventions among end users.

Methods

At trial conclusion, we surveyed 39 primary care providers (PCPs) to identify preferences about components of the clinic intervention, conducted two focus groups among non-PCP staff to elicit in-depth attitudes and experiences with operationalizing the team-based CKD registry, and conducted eight focus groups with English- and Spanish-speaking patients to hear about their experiences with the CKD-SMS program. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Self-reported participation and data from the automated telephone program were used to evaluate patient engagement.

Results

Most PCPs (94%) believed that the point-of-care notifications benefited clinic workflow and agreed that quarterly feedback enhanced their ability to identify (89.5%) and manage (73.7%) CKD. Staff confirmed usefulness of point-of-care notifications. Patients suggested the automated telephone system was impersonal, though easy to use; that frequent automated calls were helpful to reinforce self-management behaviors; and that telephone health coaching was convenient. Nearly 40% of patients completed >80% of automated phone calls, 95% participated in calls with their health coach and 77% created at least one action plan.

Conclusions

A CKD registry is acceptable to primary care health care teams and has potential to enhance identification and management of CKD in primary care. Low-income patients appreciated and engaged with a telephone-based CKD-SMS program, demonstrating its potential for increasing awareness and health engagement among populations with CKD within a public health care delivery system.

Background

We explored the association between health literacy and self-care behaviors among low-income patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

We used baseline data from the Kidney Awareness Registry and Education trial (n = 137 patients with CKD) and multivariable logistic regressions to cross-sectionally examine the association between health literacy, defined by a validated questionnaire, and healthy behaviors.

Results

Study participants had a mean age of 55 years, were racially diverse (6% White, 36% Hispanic, 43% Black, 15% Asian) and 26% had low health literacy. Over one-third (38%) had hypertension, 51% had diabetes, and 67% had CKD stage 3 or 4. Compared to individuals with adequate health literacy, those with low health literacy had non-statistically significant higher tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.33; 95% CI 0.90-6.06) and lower consumption of sugary beverages (aOR = 0.50; 0.20-1.23) and statistically significant decreased fast food intake (aOR = 0.38; 0.16-0.93). Health literacy was not associated with differences in medication adherence (0.84; 0.38-1.89) or physical activity (aOR = 2.39; 0.54-10.53).

Conclusions

Health literacy was not uniformly associated with all self-care behaviors important for CKD management. A more nuanced understanding of the association of health literacy and self-care may be necessary to promote participation in behaviors known to slow CKD progression.

Background

Awareness of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is suboptimal among patients with CKD, perhaps due to poor readability of patient education materials (PEMs). We reviewed the suitability and readability of common PEMs that focused on 5 content areas: basics of CKD, risk factors for CKD development, risk factors for CKD progression, complications of CKD and self-management strategies to improve kidney health.

Methods

Three reviewers (nephrologist, primary care physician, patient) used the Suitability Assessment of Materials to rate PEMs on message content/stimulation of learning, typography, visuals and layout and determined literacy level. Mean ratings were calculated for each PEM by content area and overall (superior = 70-100; adequate = 40-69; inadequate = <40). Linear regression was used to determine the impact of literacy level on mean rating.

Results

We reviewed 69 PEMs from 19 organizations, divided into 113 content area sections. Most (79%) PEM sections were 'adequate' (mean rating, 58.3%). Inclusion of patient-centered content and opportunities for patient interaction were associated with 'superior' ratings. Mean ratings (SD) were similar across content areas: basics of CKD, 58.9% (9.1); risk factors for CKD development, 57.0% (12.3); risk factors for CKD progression, 58.5% (12.0); CKD complications, 62.3% (15.7), and self-management strategies, 62.2% (12.3). ≤6th grade literacy level (vs. >6th grade) was associated with an 11.7 point higher mean rating.

Conclusion

Most PEMs for kidney disease were adequate. Outstanding PEMs shared characteristics of patient centeredness, a low literacy level, and patient interaction. Providers should be aware of strengths and limitations of PEMs when educating their patients about CKD.

Background

Many individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) do not receive guideline-concordant care. We examined the impact of a team-based primary care CKD registry on clinical measures and processes of care among patients with CKD cared for in a public safety-net health care delivery system.

Study design

Pragmatic trial of a CKD registry versus a usual-care registry for 1 year.

Setting & participants

Primary care providers (PCPs) and their patients with CKD in a safety-net primary care setting in San Francisco.

Intervention

The CKD registry identified at point of care all patients with CKD, those with blood pressure (BP)>140/90mmHg, those without angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) prescription, and those without albuminuria quantification in the past year. It also provided quarterly feedback pertinent to these metrics to promote "outreach" to patients with CKD. The usual-care registry provided point-of-care cancer screening and immunization data.

Outcomes

Changes in systolic BP at 12 months (primary outcome), proportion of patients with BP control, prescription of ACE inhibitors/ARBs, quantification of albuminuria, severity of albuminuria, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Results

The patient population (n=746) had a mean age of 56.7±12.1 (standard deviation) years, was 53% women, and was diverse (8% non-Hispanic white, 35.7% black, 24.5% Hispanic, and 24.4% Asian). Randomization to the CKD registry (30 PCPs, 285 patients) versus the usual-care registry (49 PCPs, 461 patients) was associated with 2-fold greater odds of ACE inhibitor/ARB prescription (adjusted OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.45-3.49) and albuminuria quantification (adjusted OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.38-4.29) during the 1-year study period. Randomization to the CKD registry was not associated with changes in systolic BP, proportion of patients with uncontrolled BP, or degree of albuminuria or estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Limitations

Potential misclassification of CKD; missing baseline medication data; limited to study of a public safety-net health care system.

Conclusions

A team-based safety-net primary care CKD registry did not improve BP parameters, but led to greater albuminuria quantification and more ACE inhibitor/ARB prescriptions after 1 year. Adoption of team-based CKD registries may represent an important step in translating evidence into practice for CKD management.

Rationale & objective

Data from patients in one delivery system have suggested that the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) awareness differs by how the question is asked. We examined the sensitivity and specificity of different CKD awareness questions among diverse community-dwelling adults who were not necessarily engaged in primary care to determine the generalizability of prior results.

Study design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting & participants

Participants in the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity Across the Life Span (HANDLS) Study.

Predictor

CKD awareness, ascertained using 5 different questions.

Outcome

Sensitivity and specificity of each awareness question, using laboratory results as the gold standard.

Analytic approach

Logistic regression was used to compare sensitivities of different awareness questions.

Results

Among 2,046 participants, mean (SD) age was 56.5 (9.1) years, 41.5% were men, and 61.3% were African American. More than 40% were poor, 35% reported not having health insurance, and 16.9% had low health literacy. More than 20% (n = 424) had CKD. Sensitivities of single CKD awareness questions ranged from 2.2% for "kidney damage" to 5.2% for "kidney problem." Sensitivity of the compound question asking about "weak kidneys, failing kidneys, or kidney disease" was 19.5%. Sensitivity of this compound CKD awareness question was higher among study participants with more advanced CKD and low health literacy, and those who lived below the poverty level.

Limitations

Single measures of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria; study participants may have been more engaged in their health care than the average US adult, potentially limiting the generalizability of results.

Conclusions

CKD awareness is low among community-dwelling adults with kidney disease, though data using a sensitive compound question ascertaining awareness suggest that we have met the Healthy People 2020 goal related to CKD awareness of 13.4%. Understanding the phrases about kidney disease that are most understandable to patients with and at risk for CKD is important to further increase CKD awareness.

Rationale & objective

Sustainable interventions that enhance chronic kidney disease (CKD) management are not often studied in safety-net primary care, in which populations bear a disproportionate burden of disease and experience translational gaps between research and practice. We tested the feasibility of implementing and the impact of 2 technology-enhanced interventions designed to enhance CKD care delivery.

Study design

A 2×2 randomized controlled pilot trial.

Setting & participants

Primary care provider teams (n = 6) and 137 patients with CKD aged 18 to 75 years from 2 safety-net primary care clinics, 2013 to 2015.

Interventions

Primary care provider teams were randomly assigned to access a CKD registry with point-of-care notifications and quarterly feedback or a usual-care registry for 12 months. Patients within provider teams were randomly assigned to participate in a CKD self-management support program or usual care for 12 months.

Outcomes

We examined recruitment, randomization, and participation in each intervention. We also examined the impact of each intervention and their combination on change in systolic blood pressure (SBP), albuminuria, and patient self-reported behavioral measures after 12 months.

Results

Among potentially eligible patients identified using the electronic health record, 24% were eligible for study participation, of whom 35% (n = 137) were enrolled. Mean age was 55 years, 41% were non-English speaking, and 93% were of racial/ethnic minority. Mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70.5 (SD = 30.3) mL/min/1.73 m²; mean baseline SBP was 131 (SD = 21.8) mm Hg. Nearly 90% of clinicians reported that the CKD registry influenced their CKD management. More than 95% of patients randomly assigned to CKD self-management support engaged regularly with the intervention. Estimated changes in SBP over 1 year were nonstatistically different in each of the 3 intervention groups compared with usual care: (usual care: 0.5 [95% CI, -5.2 to 6.3] mm Hg; CKD registry only: -5.4 [95% CI, -12.2 to 1.4] mm Hg; CKD self-management support only: -6.4 [95% CI, -13.7 to 1.0] mm Hg; and CKD registry plus CKD self-management support: -0.5 [-5.5 to 4.5] mm Hg), though differences were larger among those with baseline SBPs > 140/90 mm Hg. Decreases in albuminuria were similarly nonstatistically different in each of the intervention groups compared with usual care. No differences were observed in patient self-reported behaviors.

Limitations

Single health system.

Conclusions

Patient and provider interventions to improve CKD care are feasible to implement in low-income settings with promising results among those with uncontrolled blood pressure.

Funding

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT01530958.