Performance for many visual tasks improves with training. The magnitude of improvement following training depends on the training task, number of trials per training session and the total amount of training. Does the magnitude of improvement also depend on the frequency of training sessions? In this study, we compared the learning effect for three groups of normally sighted observers who repeatedly practiced the task of identifying crowded letters in the periphery for six sessions (1000 trials per session), according to three different training schedules-one group received one session of training everyday, the second group received a training session once a week and the third group once every 2weeks. Following six sessions of training, all observers improved in their performance of identifying crowded letters in the periphery. Most importantly, the magnitudes of improvement were similar across the three training groups. The improvement was accompanied by a reduction in the spatial extent of crowding, an increase in the size of visual span and a reduction in letter-size threshold. The magnitudes of these accompanied improvements were also similar across the three training groups. Our finding that the effectiveness of visual perceptual learning is similar for daily, weekly and biweekly training has significant implication for adopting perceptual learning as an option to improve visual functions for clinical patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxicity can be a complication of anthracycline- or trastuzumab-based therapy for breast cancer patients. Screening echocardiograms (ECHOs) and radionuclide ventriculograms (RVGs) are often performed before administration of these agents to evaluate cardiac function. Limited evidence for the clinical utility of these screening tests is available. METHODS: Early-stage breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2011 (n = 1,067) with baseline ECHOs/RVGs were identified in a single institution prospective registry. Medical record review was performed to obtain pre- and post-ECHO/RVG treatment plans, baseline ECHO/RVG results, cardiac risk factors, and cardiac events. Patients with cardiac history were excluded. ECHO/RVG abnormalities were defined as ejection fraction (EF) <55%, valvular disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic dysfunction. Cardiac events were defined as heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, valvular disease, or angina during or after chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among 600 eligible patients, abnormal ECHO/RVG results were observed in 13 (2.2%, 1.2%-3.7%), including 9 with baseline EF <55%. There were no detected changes in treatment plans, although more frequent cardiac monitoring was recommended for 2 patients. There were no significant differences in age, race, menopausal status, smoking history, alcohol use, body mass index, or medical comorbidities between patients with abnormal and normal results. In follow-up (mean, 4.0 years; range, 0-8.3), 15 patients developed cardiac events (none of whom had had abnormal baseline ECHOs/RVGs). CONCLUSION: Baseline ECHO/RVG in patients without prior cardiac history rarely yields an abnormality that prompts change in planned anthracycline- and/or trastuzumab-based treatment. Moreover, few cardiac events developed in this screened population in follow-up. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Baseline cardiac function screening with echocardiograms or radionuclide ventriculograms is frequently performed before administration of anthracycline- or trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients due to the relatively low cost and risk to patients and the concern for potential cardiotoxicity. However, at a population level, these tests can take up time and can add up to significant costs for both patients and the health care system. This study finds that in patients with no history of cardiac disease, baseline cardiac function screening rarely identifies abnormalities that change treatment plans. Moreover, few cardiac events develop in an average of 4 years of follow-up, including none in patients with abnormal baseline cardiac function screening results. This suggests that baseline cardiac function screening may have limited utility in chemotherapy planning in young breast cancer patients with no history of cardiac disease.