Objectives

To evaluate the peripheral hearing sensitivity and central auditory processing in persons with HIV (PWH) and persons without HIV (PWoH); and the association between cognitive function and central auditory processing in PWH and PWoH.

Design

Cross-sectional, observational study.

Methods

Participants included 67 PWH {70.2% men; mean age = 66.6 years [standard deviation (SD) = 4.7 years]} and 35 PWoH [51.4% men; mean age = 72.9 years (SD = 7.0 years)]. Participants completed a hearing assessment and a central auditory processing assessment that included dichotic digits testing (DDT). Pure-tone air-conduction thresholds were obtained at octave frequencies from 0.25 through 8 kHz. A pure-tone average (PTA) was calculated from 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz thresholds for each ear. Participants also completed a neuropsychological battery assessing cognition in seven domains.

Results

PWH had slightly lower (i.e. better) PTAs compared with PWoH, but this was not statistically significant. Conversely, PWH and PWoH had similar DDT results for both ears. Poorer verbal fluency, learning, and working memory performance was significantly related to lower DDT scores, and those defined as having verbal fluency, learning, and working memory impairment had significantly poorer DDT scores (8-18% lower) in both ears.

Conclusion

Hearing and DDT results were similar in PWH and PWoH. The relationship between verbal fluency, learning, and working memory impairment and poorer DDT results did not differ by HIV serostatus. Clinicians, particularly audiologists, should be mindful of cognitive functioning abilities when evaluating central auditory processing.

Background

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HANDs) remain prevalent despite antiretroviral therapy, particularly among older people with HIV (PWH). However, the diagnosis of HAND is labor intensive and requires expertise to administer neuropsychological tests. Our prior pilot work established the feasibility and accuracy of a computerized self-administered virtual reality program (DETECT; Display Enhanced Testing for Cognitive Impairment and Traumatic Brain Injury) to measure cognition in younger PWH. The present study expands this to a larger sample of older PWH.

Methods

We enrolled PWH who were ≥60 years old, were undergoing antiretroviral therapy, had undetectable plasma viral loads, and were without significant neuropsychological confounds. HAND status was determined via Frascati criteria. Regression models that controlled for demographic differences (age, sex, education, race/ethnicity) examined the association between DETECT's cognition module and both HAND status and Global Deficit Score (GDS) derived via traditional neuropsychological tests.

Results

Seventy-nine PWH (mean age, 66 years; 28% women) completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery and DETECT's cognition module. Twenty-five (32%) had HAND based on the comprehensive battery. A significant correlation was found between the DETECT cognition module and the neuropsychological battery (r = 0.45, P < .001). Furthermore, in two separate regression models, HAND status (b = -0.79, P < .001) and GDS impairment status (b = -0.83, P < .001) significantly predicted DETECT performance. Areas under the curve for DETECT were 0.78 for differentiating participants by HAND status (HAND vs no HAND) and 0.85 for detecting GDS impairment.

Conclusions

The DETECT cognition module provides a novel means to identify cognitive impairment in older PWH. As DETECT is fully immersive and self-administered, this virtual reality tool holds promise as a scalable cognitive screening battery.