Macroautophagy/autophagy plays a dual role in many physiological processes of multicellular eukaryotes. In plants, autophagy can be used by both host and pathogen for a beneficiary infection outcome. Plants employ a two-tier innate immune system to defend against invading pathogens. Cell surface localized pattern recognition receptors recognize conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and launch pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) to provide broad-spectrum resistance. Pathogens inject a battery of effector proteins into their hosts to counter PTI and compromise the primary immune response. Hosts induce a second layer of defense called effector-triggered immunity (ETI) to counter the effects of these effectors. In addition to ETI and PTI, autophagy is emerging as a central cellular process modulated by both host and pathogens toward their respective advantage. Pathogens lacking the ability to inject effectors are compromised in virulence. However, molecular targets and biochemical characterization of most of these effector proteins remain elusive. In a recent paper we presented a systematic analysis of interaction between autophagy proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana with effectors from bacterial, fungal, oomycete and nematode pathogens. Abbreviations: ATG, autophagy related; BiFC, bimolecular fluorescence complementation; ETI, effector-triggered immunity; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; PTI, pattern-triggered immunity.

Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is responsible for the majority of oropharyngeal and cervical cancers in the USA. Currently, HPV curricula within medical and dental schools are not standardized. As such, we implemented a brief online educational intervention to increase medical and dental trainees' knowledge of the HPV vaccine and the association between HPV and cancer. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess medical and dental trainees' baseline knowledge regarding HPV and HPV vaccine, (2) determine the willingness to recommend the HPV vaccine to patients, and (3) evaluate the impact of an online intervention on HPV-related knowledge. Medical and dental trainees from two large academic centers in the USA were asked to fill out an online pre-intervention questionnaire, followed by a 10-min HPV educational intervention based on the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) resources, and then a post-intervention questionnaire. There were 75 participants (67.4% females; median age 18-30 years). When asked about HPV-related cancer types, the correct response increased from 28.4% (pre-intervention) to 51.9% (post-intervention; p < 0.01). When asked about the prevalence of HPV infections, the correct response improved from 36 to 72% (p < 0.01). There was also a 25.2% improvement in identifying the correct HPV vaccination dosing schedule (p < 0.01). Eighty-seven percent of the participants mentioned that the online education improved their HPV knowledge, and 68.5% reported that they were more likely to recommend HPV vaccine after the online intervention. The proposed online educational intervention was effective at improving HPV-related cancer and HPV vaccine knowledge as well as attitudes towards vaccine recommendation among dental and medical trainees and could be implemented in medical and dental school curricula in the future.