Despite recent advances in novel therapies, the prognosis for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) remains poor. Progress in understanding the biology of cancer has led to the development of personalized therapy targeted at blocking defective signaling pathways of cancer cells. These drugs aim to act selectively to reduce the adverse effects associated with systemic therapy. Cetuximab (Erbitux®), an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR)-targeted agent, is the only approved targeted therapy for patients with SCCHN. However, resistance to EGFR therapy remains a major obstacle to achieving a positive clinical outcome with cetuximab. Other therapies that offer better clinical outcomes in patients with advanced SCCHN are urgently needed. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, which is downstream of EGFR, has also been implicated in SCCHN development and progression, and therefore, targeting this pathway offers another rational treatment approach. This review discusses the potential role of PI3K pathway inhibitors in the treatment of patients with advanced SCCHN, both alone and in combination with other therapies.

Background

Neurologic toxicities with immune therapy are rare, but can cause devastating and often permanent injury when they occur. Although there is increasing interest in the potential synergism between immune therapy and radiation, it is possible that such combinations may lead to a greater number or increased severity of immune-related adverse events. We present here a case of extensive and progressive transverse myelitis following combined therapy, which did not improve until treatment with infliximab. This case highlights the unmet need for treatment of adverse events that are refractory to consensus recommendations, and may ultimately require further study and incorporation into future published guidelines.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 68-year-old with metastatic melanoma, who developed transverse myelitis in the setting of immune checkpoint blockade and spinal irradiation for vertebral metastases. Despite management according to published consensus guidelines: cessation of immune therapy, high-dose steroids, and plasmapheresis, he continued to deteriorate neurologically, and imaging revealed a progressive and ascending transverse myelitis. The patient was then treated with infliximab, and demonstrated dramatic imaging and modest clinical improvement following the first treatment cycle.

Conclusions

This is the first report describing the successful use of infliximab in immune therapy and radiation-related transverse myelitis that was not responding to recommended therapy. Evaluation of additional treatment options such as infliximab for high-grade immune-related neurologic toxicities is warranted, and may be needed earlier in the disease process to prevent significant morbidity. The adverse effects of immune therapy when used in combination with radiation also require further investigation.

Purpose

Compared with conventional radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may reduce acute toxicity from anal cancer treatment, potentially leading to improved long-term outcomes. We analyze the effect of IMRT on short- and long-term outcomes among a large sample of US veterans.

Methods and materials

From a national Veterans Affairs database, we identified 779 patients (n = 403 conventional radiation therapy, n = 376 IMRT) with locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 and treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Radiation treatment planning and dosimetric constraints were not standardized across patients. We analyzed the effect of IMRT on short-term outcomes (acute toxicity, treatment breaks, and incomplete chemotherapy) and long-term outcomes (survival and ostomy placement) in multivariable logistic regression, Fine-Gray, and frailty models, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

IMRT was associated with decreased radiation treatment breaks ≥5 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.91; P = .02), increased rates of receiving 2 cycles of mitomycin C chemotherapy (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.22-3.45; P = .007), increased rates of receiving 2 cycles of any chemotherapy (OR 3.45; 95% CI 1.82-6.25; P < .001), and decreased risk of ostomy related to tumor recurrence or progression (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.60; 95% CI 0.37-0.99; P = .045). IMRT was not associated with a decrease in grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity (P = .79), hospitalization for gastrointestinal toxicity (P = .59), or cancer-specific survival (P = 0.18).

Conclusions

Among a large sample of US veterans with anal cancer, IMRT was associated with higher rates of receiving 2 chemotherapy cycles, decreased radiation treatment breaks, and decreased rates of ostomy placement. IMRT appears to offer substantial benefits over conventional radiation therapy for patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy for anal cancer.

The purpose of this study was to describe our clinical experience using optically-guided linear accelerator (linac)-based frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of brain metastases. Sixty-five patients (204 lesions) were treated between 2005 and 2008 with frameless SRS using an optically-guided bite-block system. Patients had a median of 2 lesions (range, 1–13). Prescription dose ranged from 14 to 22 Gy (median, 18 Gy) and was given in a single fraction. Clinical and radiographic evaluation occurred every 2–4 months following treatment. At a median follow-up of 6.2 months, actuarial survival at 12 months was 40% [95% confidence interval (CI), 28–52). Of 135 lesions that were evaluable for local control (LC), 119 lesions (88%) did not show evidence of progression. Actuarial 12 month LC was 76% (95% CI, 66–86). Tumors ≤2 cm in size had a better 12 month LC rate (81% vs. 36%, P = 0.017) than those >2 cm. Adverse events occurred in three patients (5%). Optically-guided linac-based frameless SRS can produce clinical outcomes that compare favorably to frame-based techniques. As this technique is convenient to use and allows for the uncomplicated delivery of hypofractionated radiotherapy, frameless SRS will likely have an increasingly important role in the management of brain metastases.

Background and purpose

Incidental irradiation of normal brain tissue during radiotherapy is linked to cognitive decline, and may be mediated by damage to healthy cortex. Non-coplanar techniques may be used for cortical sparing. We compared normal brain sparing and probability of cortical atrophy using 4π radiation therapy planning vs. standard fixed gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Material and methods

Plans from previously irradiated brain tumor patients ("original IMRT", n = 13) were re-planned to spare cortex using both 4π optimization ("4π") and IMRT optimization ("optimized IMRT"). Homogeneity index (HI), gradient measure, doses to cortex and white matter (excluding tumor), brainstem, optics, and hippocampus were compared with matching PTV coverage. Probability of three grades of post-treatment cortical atrophy was modeled based on previously established dose response curves.

Results

With matching PTV coverage, 4π significantly improved HI by 27% (p = 0.005) and gradient measure by 8% (p = 0.001) compared with optimized IMRT. 4π optimization reduced mean and equivalent uniform doses (EUD) to all standard OARs, with 14-15% reduction in hippocampal EUD (p ≤ 0.003) compared with the other two plans. 4π significantly reduced dose to fractional cortical volumes (V₅₀, V₄₀ and V₃₀) compared with the original IMRT plans, and reduced cortical V₃₀ by 7% (p = 0.008) compared with optimized IMRT. White matter EUD, mean dose, and fractional volumes V₅₀, V₄₀ and V₃₀ were also significantly lower with 4π (p ≤ 0.001). With 4π, probability of grade 1, 2 and 3 cortical atrophy decreased by 12%, 21% and 26% compared with original IMRT and by 8%, 14% and 3% compared with optimized IMRT, respectively (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

4π radiotherapy significantly improved cortical sparing and reduced doses to standard brain OARs, white matter, and the hippocampus. This was achieved with superior PTV dose homogeneity. Such sparing could reduce the probability of cortical atrophy that may lead to cognitive decline.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Incidental irradiation of normal brain tissue during radiotherapy is linked to cognitive decline, and may be mediated by damage to healthy cortex. Non-coplanar techniques may be used for cortical sparing. We compared normal brain sparing and probability of cortical atrophy using 4π radiation therapy planning vs. standard fixed gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS:Plans from previously irradiated brain tumor patients ("original IMRT", n = 13) were re-planned to spare cortex using both 4π optimization ("4π") and IMRT optimization ("optimized IMRT"). Homogeneity index (HI), gradient measure, doses to cortex and white matter (excluding tumor), brainstem, optics, and hippocampus were compared with matching PTV coverage. Probability of three grades of post-treatment cortical atrophy was modeled based on previously established dose response curves. RESULTS:With matching PTV coverage, 4π significantly improved HI by 27% (p = 0.005) and gradient measure by 8% (p = 0.001) compared with optimized IMRT. 4π optimization reduced mean and equivalent uniform doses (EUD) to all standard OARs, with 14-15% reduction in hippocampal EUD (p ≤ 0.003) compared with the other two plans. 4π significantly reduced dose to fractional cortical volumes (V50, V40 and V30) compared with the original IMRT plans, and reduced cortical V30 by 7% (p = 0.008) compared with optimized IMRT. White matter EUD, mean dose, and fractional volumes V50, V40 and V30 were also significantly lower with 4π (p ≤ 0.001). With 4π, probability of grade 1, 2 and 3 cortical atrophy decreased by 12%, 21% and 26% compared with original IMRT and by 8%, 14% and 3% compared with optimized IMRT, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:4π radiotherapy significantly improved cortical sparing and reduced doses to standard brain OARs, white matter, and the hippocampus. This was achieved with superior PTV dose homogeneity. Such sparing could reduce the probability of cortical atrophy that may lead to cognitive decline.

PURPOSE:To study the effects of immunosuppression on treatment toxicity, long-term cancer recurrence risk, and survival among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive anal cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS:From a nationwide retrospective cohort of veterans with anal cancer we identified 142 HIV-positive patients with stage I-III disease, diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 and treated with definitive-intent chemotherapy and radiation. We used regression models to study the impact of pretreatment CD4 counts and longitudinal posttreatment CD4 counts on outcomes including acute toxicity, long-term ostomy rates, cancer recurrence, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. All models were adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS:The median pretreatment CD4 count was 375 cells/mm3, which dropped to 157 cells/mm3 after treatment. Each 100-cell/mm3 decrease in pretreatment CD4 count was associated with an increased risk of acute hematologic toxicity (odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.42, P=.04) and hospitalization for hematologic toxicity (odds ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.54, P=.049) but not gastrointestinal toxicity, tumor recurrence, or cancer-specific mortality (P>.05). Each 100-cells/mm3 decrease in posttreatment CD4 count increased the risk of recurrence by 54% (hazard ratio 1.54, 95% CI 1.09-2.17, P=.01) and cancer mortality by 46% at a trend level (hazard ratio 1.46, 95% CI 0.99-2.14, P=.06). Neither pre- nor posttreatment CD4 count influenced long-term ostomy rates or overall survival (all P>.05). CONCLUSIONS:Lower pretreatment CD4 counts were associated with acute hematologic toxicity, and lower posttreatment CD4 count levels were associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence. These results suggest that immune surveillance may play an important role in long-term disease control in anal cancer.

Background

Black patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have inferior survival compared to white patients. The purpose of this study was to examine disparity in specialist consultation and multimodality treatment and the impact that treatment inequality has on survival.

Methods

We identified 9935 non-Hispanic white and 1281 black patients with stage IV colorectal cancer aged 66 years and older from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. Logistic regression models identified race-based differences in consultation rates and subsequent treatment with surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Multivariable Cox regression models identified potential factors that explain race-based survival differences. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Black patients had lower rates of consultation with surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. Among patients seen in consultation, black patients received less surgery directed at the primary tumor, liver- or lung-directed surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Unadjusted survival analysis found a 15% higher chance of dying for black patients compared with white patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08 to 1.22; P < .001). Adjustment for patient, tumor, and demographic variables marginally reduced the risk of death (HR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.15; P = .03). After adjustment for differences in treatment, the increased risk of death for black patients disappeared.

Conclusions

Our study shows racial disparity in specialist consultation as well as subsequent treatment with multimodality therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, and it suggests that inferior survival for black patients may stem from this treatment disparity. Further research into the underlying causes of this inequality will improve access to treatment and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Purpose/objectives

A report of clinical outcomes of a computed tomography (CT)-based image guided brachytherapy (IGBT) technique for treatment of cervical cancer.

Methods and materials

Seventy-six women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB to IVA cervical carcinoma diagnosed between 2007 and 2014 were treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy followed by high-dose-rate (HDR) IGBT. All patients underwent planning CT simulation at each implantation. A high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) encompassing any visible tumor and the entire cervix was contoured on the simulation CT. When available, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at implantation to assist with tumor delineation. The prescription dose was prescribed to the HRCTV.

Results

The median follow-up time was 17 months. Thirteen patients (17%) had an MRI done before brachytherapy, and 16 patients (21%) were treated without MRI guidance. The mean EBRT/IGBT sum 2-Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) delivered to the 90% volume of the HRCTV was 86.3 Gy. The mean maximum EQD2s delivered to 2 cm(3) of the rectum, sigmoid, and bladder were 67.5 Gy, 66.2 Gy, and 75.3 Gy, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidences of local, locoregional, and distant failure were 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4%-14.8%), 15.1% (95% CI: 5.4%-29.4%), and 24.3% (95% CI: 12.1%-38.9%), respectively. The 2-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 75% (95% CI, 61%-91%) and 73% (95% CI, 60%-90%), respectively. Twenty-nine patients (38%) experienced grade ≥ 2 acute toxicity, with 5 cases of acute grade 3 toxicity and no grade ≥ 4 toxicities. One patient experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. No other late grade ≥ 3 events were observed.

Conclusions

This is the largest report to date of CT/MRI-based IGBT for the treatment of cervical cancer. The results are promising, with excellent local control and acceptable toxicity. Further investigation is needed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of this treatment.