In this paper we investigate the cognitive plausibility of an integrated framework for qualitative prediction of behaviour. The framework is based on the K A D S expertise modeling approach and integrates different approaches to qualitative reasoning. The framework is implemented in a program called GARP. To test the cognitive plausibility a physics problem involving qualitative prediction of behaviour was constructed. The behaviour prediction of this problem generated by G A R P was compared to think-aloud protocols of human subjects performing the same problem solving task.