Introduction: Frostbite leads to progressive ischemia eventually causing tissue necrosis if not quickly reversed. Patients with frostbite tend to present to the emergency department (ED) for assessment and treatment. Acute management includes rewarming, pain management, and (when indicated) thrombolytic therapy. Thrombolytic therapy in severe frostbite injury may decrease rates of amputation and improve patient outcomes. Fluorescence microangiography (FMA) has been used to distinguish between perfused and non-perfused tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential role of FMA in the acute care of patients with frostbite, specifically its role as a tool to identify perfusion deficit following severe frostbite injury, and to explore its role in time to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).

Methods: This retrospective analysis included all patients from December 2020–March 2021 who received FMA in a single ED as part of their initial frostbite evaluation. In total, 42 patients presented to the ED with concern for frostbite and were evaluated using FMA.

Results: Mean time from arrival in the ED to FMA was 46.3 minutes. Of the 42 patients, 14 had clinically significant perfusion deficits noted on FMA and received tPA. Mean time to tPA (measured from ED arrival to administration of tPA) for these patients was 117.4 minutes. This is significantly faster than average historical times at our institution of 240-300 minutes.

Conclusion: Bedside FMA provides objective information regarding perfusion deficits and allows for faster decision-making and improved times to tPA. Fluorescence microangiography shows promise for quick and efficient evaluation of perfusion deficits in frostbite-injured patients. This could lead to faster tPA administration and potentially greater rates of tissue salvage after severe frostbite injury.

Introduction: Falls are a frequent reason geriatric patients visit the emergency department (ED). To help providers, the Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines were created to establish a standard of care for geriatric patients in the ED. We conducted a survey of emergency providers to assess 1) their knowledge of fall epidemiology and the geriatric ED guidelines; 2) their current ED practice for geriatric fall patients; and 3) their willingness to conduct fall-prevention interventions.

Methods: We conducted an anonymous survey of emergency providers including attending physicians, residents, and physician assistants at a single, urban, Level 1 trauma, tertiary referral hospital in the northeast United States.

Results: We had a response rate of 75% (102/136). The majority of providers felt that all geriatric patients should undergo screening for fall risk factors (84%, 86/102), and most (76%, 77/102) answered that all geriatric patients screened and at risk for falls should have an intervention performed. While most (80%, 82/102) answered that geriatric falls prevention was very important, providers were not willing to spend much time on screening or interventions. Less than half (44%, 45/102) were willing to spend 2-5 minutes on a fall risk assessment and prevention, while 46% (47/102) were willing to spend less than 2 minutes.

Conclusion: Emergency providers understand the importance of geriatric fall prevention but lack knowledge of which patients to screen and are not willing to spend more than a few minutes on screening for fall interventions.  Future studies must take into account provider knowledge and willingness to intervene.